Photos vs conservation? Tourists complain big cat collars are 'spoiling their pics'
2016-09-28 09:30
If that stunning cheetah you snapped on your African safari was wearing a radio collar, does that diminish your pic?
For some tourists and wildlife photographers, yes it does.
The AfriCat Foundation has had to reiterate on its Facebook page just why big cats on its reserve in northern Namibia are collared and the research benefits that this practice brings after a few visitors, apparently, "complained they did not get an opportunity to photograph [the animal] without a collar."
"Clients have to start understanding that when an animal is seen wearing a radio-collar – it’s a positive sighting," AfriCat Namibia said in a post on Tuesday.
AfriCat Namibia is headquartered at Okonjima Game Reserve between Windhoek and the Etosha National Park. The foundation rescues and rehabilitates big carnivores -- including cheetahs -- so that they learn to become self-sustaining and can eventually return to their natural environment.
The foundation said that if an animal on the reserve is seen wearing a radio collar "it means research is being conducted and more information about... that animal 'in a certain environment' will be available in the near future."
"[Visitors] should welcome the efforts made to come up with regular and new and constant information, instead of complaining that they did not get an opportunity to photograph it without a collar," the foundation said.
This is not a new gripe, it seems.
In a newsletter in 2011, the foundation explained that the size of the collars fitted to each rehabilitated predator at Okonjima had diminished in recent years, allowing for a "more pleasant-looking collar."
But AfriCat conceded then that the presence of these collars "is the one feature that creates the most 'talk' – controversial at times -- between keen photographers, operators and the guests staying at Okonjima."
A contributor to a SafariTalk.net thread on radio collars last year admitted that he did not find radio collars "aesthetically pleasing" but he said he could tolerate them if he knew they were part of some valuable research. Another said he tried to get an angle for his photographs which did not show the collar on an animal.
Conservation is high on the agenda at the moment, as the 17th Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) conference is taking place in SA at the Sandton Convention Centre in Johannesburg until 5 October.
The DEA invited the South African public to raise their voices and participate in the CITES CoP17. The invitation calls on wildlife enthusiasts among the South African public to attend the exhibitions and workshops for free.
Photos vs conservation? Tourists complain big cat collars are 'spoiling their pics'
- Lisbeth
- Site Admin
- Posts: 67388
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
- Country: Switzerland
- Location: Lugano
- Contact:
Photos vs conservation? Tourists complain big cat collars are 'spoiling their pics'
"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
Re: Photos vs conservation? Tourists complain big cat collars are 'spoiling their pics'
Aag come on man What percentage of animals are actually wearing collars One per 1000 , or maybe even less
It is already very lucky to see an animal at all , and then , to see one wearing a collar .... How lucky can you get
It is already very lucky to see an animal at all , and then , to see one wearing a collar .... How lucky can you get
Enough is enough
Re: Photos vs conservation? Tourists complain big cat collars are 'spoiling their pics'
Conservation should of course prevail on aesthetism and pictures.
But I have talked to several veterinarians on that "obsession" (as they said) of some conservationists to put collar to a lot of animals even when it is not justified by their studies. For example a big pride of Wild Dogs in the Kruger that is regularly seen by rangers or tourists who can report their sightings does not need to be collared to be monitored. Or in a small private reserve.
According to these veterinarians, the life expectancy of a collared animal is lower than the average for several reasons : it can be rejected by the group, even if it is an alpha male/female, it can be caught in a branch or bushes, it is less rapid and agile with the collar etc...
I have no personal opinion on that very point, but the less intervention by humans the better.
But I have talked to several veterinarians on that "obsession" (as they said) of some conservationists to put collar to a lot of animals even when it is not justified by their studies. For example a big pride of Wild Dogs in the Kruger that is regularly seen by rangers or tourists who can report their sightings does not need to be collared to be monitored. Or in a small private reserve.
According to these veterinarians, the life expectancy of a collared animal is lower than the average for several reasons : it can be rejected by the group, even if it is an alpha male/female, it can be caught in a branch or bushes, it is less rapid and agile with the collar etc...
I have no personal opinion on that very point, but the less intervention by humans the better.
- Flutterby
- Posts: 44150
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:28 pm
- Country: South Africa
- Location: Gauteng, South Africa
- Contact:
Re: Photos vs conservation? Tourists complain big cat collars are 'spoiling their pics'
Agree with you too Dindingwe!
Re: Photos vs conservation? Tourists complain big cat collars are 'spoiling their pics'
Well , lets face it , the world is heading very fast towards either seeing wild animals wearing collars , or seeing no wild animals at all
The choice , IMHO , is a no-brainer ..........
Then , of course , there is the other side of the coin , in that many tourists absolutely insist that they must see these predators during their visit , and then of course , it does happen , especially in small , private reserves , that specifically keep track of their animals so that they can know at all times where to take their spoilt guests
And , if is such a big deal not have the collar visible , well , there are always programs such as photoshop
The choice , IMHO , is a no-brainer ..........
Then , of course , there is the other side of the coin , in that many tourists absolutely insist that they must see these predators during their visit , and then of course , it does happen , especially in small , private reserves , that specifically keep track of their animals so that they can know at all times where to take their spoilt guests
And , if is such a big deal not have the collar visible , well , there are always programs such as photoshop
Enough is enough
- Richprins
- Committee Member
- Posts: 75964
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
- Location: NELSPRUIT
- Contact:
Re: Photos vs conservation? Tourists complain big cat collars are 'spoiling their pics'
Good points all!
Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
- nan
- Posts: 26310
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2012 9:41 pm
- Country: Switzerland
- Location: Central Europe
- Contact:
Re: Photos vs conservation? Tourists complain big cat collars are 'spoiling their pics'
we visit parks for pictures.... or for animals and Learning about them
Kgalagadi lover… for ever
https://safrounet.piwigo.com/
https://safrounet.piwigo.com/