What is the situation/progress with the proposed hotels in Kruger?

General Information & Discussion on Hotels in Kruger
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67372
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: What is the situation/progress with the proposed hotels?

Post by Lisbeth »

frivolous allegations
Offensive!! Nothing "frivolous" in the allegations ( Does he know what frivolous means :-? )
They always throw mud in the hope that some of it will stick.
Hopefully it will stick!!
salaries and bonuses are not determined by the Executive Management
By whom are they determined ? -O-
SANParks has a board that holds management accountable and the Minister is also there to make sure that we follow procedure. The Board is appointed by the Minister and one fails to understand what its composition has to do with SANParks.
IMO it has a lot to do with Sanparks....they are the ones running the Parks 0-

Climbing on mirrors once again 0*\


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
H. erectus
Posts: 5851
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:43 pm
Country: South Africa
Contact:

Re: What is the situation/progress with the proposed hotels?

Post by H. erectus »

When the ship begins too sink the rats begin too scurry!!!


O**


Heh,.. H.e
Twigga
Posts: 1001
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 11:43 am
Country: Sunny SA
Location: So close, but yet so far...
Contact:

Re: What is the situation/progress with the proposed hotels?

Post by Twigga »

H. erectus wrote:When the ship begins too sink the rats begin too scurry!!!


O**


\O \O \O

If the "alleged" are false then why are they so offensive?
Flutterby wrote:[The main gripe of Aikona is on the hotel development, hence the name of their organisation. They have buried their heads in the sand thinking that conservation should still be conducted the way it was in the 15th century. This is the 21st century and we have diverse needs from current paying clients and those needs have to be fulfilled if we are to continue having viable protected areas. There are different kinds of people who go to safaris in this day and age, those who still do camping, those that do self-catering and the ones that would prefer to have their meals prepared for them at any time of the day.
Yes at what cost? I just hope you are prepared to do mayor damage control when the latter blows up in your face?


Somewhere in Kruger
User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 75950
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: What is the situation/progress with the proposed hotels?

Post by Richprins »

Hey, Twigga!

Regarding cost the Skuks Hotel is to be paid for by SP, R20 000 000. Budgeted for and and of story! Ironically, the costs of the Conference Centre ballooned massively after tender cockups, not budgeted for... O-/


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
User avatar
Flutterby
Posts: 44150
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:28 pm
Country: South Africa
Location: Gauteng, South Africa
Contact:

Re: What is the situation/progress with the proposed hotels?

Post by Flutterby »

Opinion piece on Aikona


Date: 7th October 2013

The South African National Parks (SANParks) was not surprised by the call made by AIKONA – a non-governmental group objecting to hotel developments in the Kruger National Park last week requesting the Public Protector to investigate certain issues that they conclude amount to “maladministration”. The issues range from the bonuses paid to the executive management, to the composition of the board, to the so called “commercialization” of the Kruger National Park (KNP) and they are also – questioning why the executive should be paid bonuses while rhinos are being poached.

Opinion piece on Aikona - Afrikaans version.

Firstly, AIKONA has every right to exercise the public interest right like any citizen as directed by the constitution of the republic however such a right should be executed without maligning the reputation and integrity of SANParks and its employees. Unfortunately AIKONA is on an ideological and political warpath to protect apartheid era conservation legacies by projecting the current leadership at SANParks as out of sync with its mandate, incompetent, corrupt and reckless. The choice of conducting their malicious accusations in certain publications raises more questions than answers. This is a clear indication that AIKONA’s interests are only focused on one section of the population. We view this as only a well-designed strategy to peddle their smear campaign to retain past privileges enjoyed by certain sections of the population in every which way and frustrate any form of transformation that seeks to open the park system to the entire nation. We should also mention that AIKONA had previously approached SANParks using Promotion of Access to Information Act, requesting information similar to the accusations they are throwing at SANParks. This information was prepared accordingly and is still awaiting collection by AIKONA.

This is an indication of a group of people using every tactic to abuse a Section 9 institution in order to achieve a vested ideological and political agenda, under the disguise of a “public right”, hence they were the first to tell the whole world that SANParks is being investigated even before the Public Protector communicated with us.

SANParks has nothing to hide. Salaries of all staff from the general worker to the CEO are determined by the board using independent specialists. The CEO’s salary, which was singled out by AIKONA, was last benchmarked with 17 other public entities in the “large entities” category and was found to be between the median and upper quartile. The comparative analysis took into consideration factors such as size of the business (estate), turnover, assets and number of countries in which it operates. SANParks is a complex organization with a diversified business ranging from conservation, climate change, a large tourism business offering 16 000 beds per night, inter-governmental relations at all spheres of government, community and social issues. We believe that all these factors, along with the CEO’s on going good performance given 10/10 clean audits the organization achieved under his leadership justifies the emoluments paid to him. We are puzzled by the call to investigate the composition of the board; this is also not the competency of SANParks. Board members serve at the invitation of the Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs.

The debate on so-called commercialization of the KNP has been going on since 1927 after the KNP’s proclamation as a national park in 1926 viz. building hotels, shops, electrification of tourism facilities, establishment of restaurants having tarred roads, swimming pools, providing air-conditioning and a lot more other things to make the visit pleasant were frowned upon, but today people are enjoying those facilities. The fact is conservation and tourism are intertwined and have evolved over time. Today SANParks serves a diverse group of tourists both local and international and to stay competitive it strive to offer a variety of products hence the two proposed hotel developments in KNP. Anything built in a national park, whether it is road, bridge, airport or hotel has to adhere to strict standards of architecture, sense and character of the place. The hotels will be built lodge-style and will blend with the existing infrastructure. The current executive has been innovative in how they finance conservation without relying much on money from the taxpayers. SANParks generates 85% of its operating budget its tourism activities not forgoing its core mandate which is conservation. AIKONA on the other hand is advocating a thesis that says the state should pay 100% for conservation. How is that possible in country with so many developmental needs? We do not believe pursuing a responsible tourism and sustainable development agenda is an enemy of biodiversity conservation.

On rhino specifically the focus is on how many animals are being saved from poachers' guns than those killed. One animal killed is one too many but it is a reality that international poaching syndicates are now focusing on Southern Africa having decimated populations in other rhino-range states. We are guided by the birth-death ratio and so far our scientists are telling us that the population is still healthy and viable. We haven’t reached a state where the more animals are killed than those that are born. We also look at how many poachers have been arrested and brought to book. The fact that we have not arrested syndicate king-pins is because those people are operating abroad in countries like Mozambique, Vietnam, Laos and China. Despite this disadvantage we have no equal comparison of successful arrests. It is a complex task and one that involves tactical para-military operations to which we have transformed ourselves.

SANParks has raised more than R100m in cash and equipment sponsorships to fight the scourge. The CEO has personally led the fight from the front with many campaigns and partnerships that he has personally inspired for technical support. He has been honored by Crime line as one of the profound leaders in fighting wildlife crime with two Awards to date. His efforts saw SANParks crafting partnerships with companies in the public entity space and the private sector defense industry to acquire the use of drones and helicopters.

The key to a victory against rhino poaching, which is a global organized crime orchestrated outside the borders of the country, does not lie with SANParks alone as Aikona would like to make us believe. It will have a lot to do with diplomatic engagements at a political level to address off-shore demand in both Mozambique & South East Asia, adequate surveillance of our national borders by organs of state designated for that responsibility (SANDF), optimal use of intelligence and acquisition of expensive modern technology which will assist rangers in their difficult task of apprehending poachers in the thick bush.

The most relevant question that the likes of Aikona should be asking is what would have happened had SANParks not intervened in the manner they did over the last 5 years? The number of rhinos killed per annum would have been in thousands and nothing would be left by now.

It is one thing to sit on the grand stand and hurl insults and unsavory comment on players in the field. It is quite another to get in there and make a contribution. Since its formation what positive contributions has Aikona made to advance the cause of conservation in South Africa except lamenting about hotels, Mabunda’ s salary and crying foul about commercialization? How much have they raised and contributed to save at least one rhino? We hope their wish to the Public Protector is granted so that we can close this chapter once and for all. There is one certainty for the likes of AIKONA, there’s no turning back the clock, SANParks will continue to be responsible in taking care of the natural heritage on behalf of all South Africans responsibly and will not reverse the clock to the pre-1994 conservation template which we believe AIKONA is nostalgic about.


Prepared by:

Ike Phaahla, Media Specialist
and
Reynold Thakhuli, Acting Head of Communications
South African National Parks
Tel: 012 426 5315/5203
Email: isaac.phaahla@sanparks.org or rey.thakhuli@sanparks.org


User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 75950
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: What is the situation/progress with the proposed hotels?

Post by Richprins »

Whoo! Two replies now! O-/

Mention the Public Protector and preperations get made quicly, with Apartheid already in the mix... O**

Will dissect tonight! :evil:


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67372
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: What is the situation/progress with the proposed hotels?

Post by Lisbeth »

Richprins wrote:
I think the Rhino part should be split off to Rhino Poaching, Flutts?
In case be copied! It is part of the "Opinion Piece" and should not be taken out of the context IMO.


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
Duke

Re: What is the situation/progress with the proposed hotels?

Post by Duke »

Can somebody direct me to the letter lodged by AIKONA to the Public protector - can't find it

Thanks.


User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 75950
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: What is the situation/progress with the proposed hotels?

Post by Richprins »



Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 75950
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: What is the situation/progress with the proposed hotels?

Post by Richprins »



Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
Post Reply

Return to “General Hotel Discussions, KNP”