WILDLIFE CRIME/TRADE/BREEDING

Information and Discussions on General Conservation Issues
Post Reply
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67241
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: WILDLIFE CRIME/TRADE

Post by Lisbeth »

Cyber sleuths crack down on online wildlife crime

09 Dec, 2019

Law enforcement agencies in Europe are making an impact on illegal wildlife e-commerce, a #WildEye data investigation shows

Image
Reptiles are among the most popular species advertised online. Green tree snakes (CITES Appendix II) are just one of the many species for sale on platforms such as Facebook and Instagram. Photo: supplied

Attempts to clamp down on online illegal wildlife trade have been boosted by more than a dozen recent interventions by law enforcement agencies in Europe, data collated by #WildEye shows. The majority of these interventions resulted in convictions and arrests in cases involving several hundred thousand euros.

The cases include the sentencing in the United Kingdom of Catherine Emberton to 120 hours of community service in 2015 for selling more than 100 pieces of jewellery containing tiger parts. Her business made close to €21,000 in total.

Police discovered she was selling the jewellery on an internet auction site. Emberton tried to pass the pieces off as antiques, which would make them exempt from requiring permits. However, the items did not qualify for exemption and most of them contained raw teeth and claws set in metal.

In 2016 antiques expert Chao Xi received a six-month prison term from the Portsmouth Magistrates’ Court in the UK, suspended for two years, for illegally trading more than €10,600 worth of ivory on eBay, which he had bought as “trinkets” for his family.

Last year 40-year-old Timothy Norris, also from the UK, was caught selling fur coats, scarves and hats made from endangered leopards and wolves on eBay. Items seized from his home were determined to have been made from animals that had been killed recently, and included clothing made from snow leopards, clouded leopards, lynxes and wolves, all of which are classified as vulnerable or endangered species.

Also in 2018 a rhino horn was seized in France after its owner put it up for sale online for €200,000. Authorities investigated the man, whose name remains unknown publicly, for almost a year before conducting a search of his home.

At the beginning of 2019, more than 200 illegally stuffed animals were seized by police in Spain after they discovered online posts advertising the animals for sale. Six people were arrested and law enforcement agents found dozens of stuffed animals, including an African lion, white rhino, Bengal tiger, hippopotamus, African crocodile, antelope and giraffe, in an illegal taxidermy workshop in Alicante.

Image
More than 200 stuffed endangered animals were seized from an illegal taxidermy workshop in Spain in February 2019. Photo: Spanish Civil Guard

Global trade

The incident in Spain was one of the more significant online-related seizures, due to its size and scale. Though the money earned illegally in these crimes is substantial in some cases, however, none of the incidents involved large-scale organised criminal networks.

And despite the successes in curbing online illegal wildlife trade, #WildEye data shows that it continues to thrive. It is part of a global illicit wildlife trade estimated to be worth between $7-billion and $23-billion each year, according to the World Economic Forum, though it is impossible to know the true value of online wildlife trafficking.

Increased access to online technologies and e-commerce platforms – as well as the rapid rise of social media – have provided new channels for criminals to operate through and, according to wildlife trade monitoring network TRAFFIC, “illegal wildlife trade has become a common occurrence online”.

In response a global partnership known as the Coalition to End Wildlife Trafficking Online was launched in March 2018. It has just over a year to reach its stated goal of reducing wildlife trafficking online by 80% by the end of 2020.

The coalition, currently made up of more than 30 partners, is led by the World Wildlife Fund, TRAFFIC and the International Fund for Animal Welfare. All the organisations involved agreed to a multifaceted approach to shut down online trade routes for cyber criminals, acknowledging there is no one solution to the problem.

Since its establishment, the coalition has actively assisted law enforcement agencies, explored new technology to detect and eliminate illegal trade information, and has raised awareness among platform users, according to TRAFFIC’s executive director, Steven Broad. He touched on the group’s activities and achievements at a gathering in Beijing in March. An additional eight internet companies joined the coalition and several publications and campaign ideas were introduced.

Image
Increased law enforcement could lead illicit traders to the dark net over time. Graphic: Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime

Dark Web

Research and analysis by the Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime suggests very few criminals turn to the Dark Web to trade in illegal wildlife because the use of closed groups and private chats on social media enable the trade so there is no need to look elsewhere for the time being. This could start to change as law enforcement “steps up” and the trade is forced to evolve into something less conspicuous, the organisation says.

Investigations by the Alliance to Counter Crime Online (ACCO) have shown how the very technologies meant to moderate harmful content on the internet actually connect traffickers faster than moderators can remove them, according to wildlife trade investigator Dan Stiles.

ACCO’s work in trying to detect and disrupt wildlife crime online focuses mainly on Facebook and Instagram, and they have publicly condemned these companies for failing to act appropriately when they see wildlife trafficking take place on their platforms.

While individuals selling illegal commodities online can be prosecuted, Stiles wrote in a commentary piece in October this year, there are not yet any legal pathways in the United States that formalise and regulate cooperation between online service providers and law enforcement agencies. The main problem is these platforms’ privacy policies and regulations.

“When it comes to social media, the enabler always walks free,” said Stiles. “It’s time for regulators to take steps to hold online platforms accountable for facilitating the illegal trafficking of wildlife.”

ACCO collects data of online posts advertising illegal wildlife for sale and passes them on to law enforcement to investigate. Together with other member organisations, they have gathered comprehensive information about how and where criminals operate, and recommendations for what internet companies and law enforcement should do to disrupt wildlife crime.

Image
Research by IFAW in 2017 found reptiles, birds and ivory are the most commonly traded species online. Graphic: Roxanne Joseph

Legal vs illegal

Ivory and reptiles are two of the most popular commodities for sale online. In 2017 IFAW recorded more than 12,000 endangered and threatened specimens offered for sale over a period of six weeks, via nearly 6,000 advertisements and posts on online marketplaces and social media platforms. Reptiles made up the largest group of animals for sale, including mainly live tortoises and turtles.

Online criminals target the remaining markets where ivory can still be sold legally as antiques. On auction sites, including eBay.uk, dozens of items made from ivory are offered for sale.

A recent study by the University of Kent found these online ivory traders are exploiting the complicated set of rules created to restrict the trade in the UK to antique items made prior to 1947. The traders claim their items are antiques, but many of the ivory products for sale on marketplaces like eBay are in fact items fashioned from poached elephant tusks.

Currently the only reliable method of determining the age of ivory – carbon dating – is an expensive and lengthy process. The online-based ivory trade highlights the difficulty in distinguishing between legal and illegal products.

Determining the legality of trade is also a problem in reptile trade online, where traders often produce counterfeit documentation. Exotic-looking reptiles, such as iguanas and the southern African giant girdled-lizard (Sungazer), are often traded through Europe, where the continent acts as a stop-over point.

Southern Africa is rich in reptile diversity, comprising almost 500 species and, according to Michael Adams, a herpetologist at the Biodiversity Company, most of the reptiles are only found nowhere else in the world. This makes them a target for the illegal pet trade.

At the same time, many endangered reptiles originating from Southern Africa are threatened and endangered, but are not protected by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) and are therefore not protected under European Union laws.

After traders smuggle the reptiles to Europe, they are mostly free to trade across borders within the EU and demand high prices without the fear of penalties.

At the Terraristika reptile trade fair in Hamm, Germany, it is difficult to tell if the deals are legal or not. Prices range from €75 for a chameleon to more than €2,000 for a boa snake. Many of the species on sale there are protected by CITES and yet thousands of euros change hands.

Every seller has a website to show off their merchandise and lots of interactions take place online, prior to the fair. According to Italian journalist Rudi Bressa, who attended the fair earlier this year, “Traders here know each other and they communicate via social networks.”

This article by the Oxpeckers’ #WildEye manager was supported by a grant from the Earth Journalism Network’s Investigating Wildlife Trafficking project


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 75838
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: WILDLIFE CRIME/TRADE

Post by Richprins »

Man arrested for carrying baby tortoises


Baby tortoises confiscated by police in Kuruman in the Northern Cape.


Image
SA Police Service

JOHANNESBURG - A hitch hiker was arrested in Kuruman in the Northern Cape on Friday for carrying baby tortoises.

The police's Brigadier Mohale Ramatseba said the suspect, in his 50s, was stopped by police while walking on the N14 in Kuruman.

It's understood he was hitch hiking to Lesotho.

Officers searched him and found 9 baby tortoises, lizard skin and springbok horns.

He'll appear in court on Monday on a charge of possessing endangered species.

https://www.enca.com/news/man-arrested- ... -tortoises


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67241
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: WILDLIFE CRIME/TRADE

Post by Lisbeth »

:O^ O/ :evil:


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67241
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: WILDLIFE CRIME/TRADE

Post by Lisbeth »

Endangered Wildlife Trust statement on China’s ban on wildlife markets

29 January 2020

The Endangered Wildlife Trust (EWT) works tirelessly across a range of projects to build capacity to combat illegal trade. We do this to achieve our conservation mission and to support an environment that sustains healthy wildlife and people. We therefore welcome the decision by Chinese authorities to ban the trade of wild animals, and we call for the government to make this a permanent rather than temporary ban.

China’s ban aims to block the spread of the coronavirus, which by 29 January had claimed the lives of at least 132 people. At this time no wildlife can be sold in or moved between markets, including online markets. The EWT recognises that international trade in wildlife has been linked to disease transmission across the globe. Illegal markets threaten endangered species and lead to overexploitation of natural resources. Of particular concern is the spread of contagious diseases between animals in wildlife markets and humans who come into contact with them. Illegal wildlife markets are therefore not only a conservation and welfare issue, but a public health issue.

The Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention tested 585 samples of wildlife specimens present at the Wuhan's Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market during the course of January and found 33 of these samples contained the coronavirus. In this market, as in so many throughout China, customers could purchase carcasses and live animals from local and international origins. African animals, such as crocodiles and pangolins, are on offer.

Disease is not the only danger consumers face from wildlife products. In Africa, many of the animals that end up in the trade chain are killed using highly toxic pesticides. Residues of these poisons have been detected on animal parts from vultures, leopards, and a range of other species. The EWT works to create awareness of this public health threat to local and international consumers, but this effort must be supported by governments and organisations in the relevant countries, including China. The Chinese government has in recent years taken increasing steps to curb the demand for wildlife products from Africa, which often end up in these wildlife markets. In 2017 the government announced its plans to shut down domestic ivory trade. In 2019, Chinese officials joined African countries in calling for an end to wildlife trafficking.

If the demand for illegal wildlife products persists, and markets go unregulated, populations will continue to be threatened by zoonotic diseases (those that spread between animals and people). These markets threaten the survival of endangered and threatened species and lead to overexploitation of our planet’s limited resources. The closest China has come to closing its wildlife markets was in 2003, following the SARS outbreak that killed almost 800 people. This effort dissipated months later and regulation remained unchanged. Understanding the threats these markets represent to both humans and wildlife, now is the right time for China to announce a permanent ban on wildlife markets.


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67241
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: WILDLIFE CRIME/TRADE

Post by Lisbeth »

Endangered Wildlife Trust statement on China’s ban on wildlife markets

29 January 2020

The Endangered Wildlife Trust (EWT) works tirelessly across a range of projects to build capacity to combat illegal trade. We do this to achieve our conservation mission and to support an environment that sustains healthy wildlife and people. We therefore welcome the decision by Chinese authorities to ban the trade of wild animals, and we call for the government to make this a permanent rather than temporary ban.

China’s ban aims to block the spread of the coronavirus, which by 29 January had claimed the lives of at least 132 people. At this time no wildlife can be sold in or moved between markets, including online markets. The EWT recognises that international trade in wildlife has been linked to disease transmission across the globe. Illegal markets threaten endangered species and lead to overexploitation of natural resources. Of particular concern is the spread of contagious diseases between animals in wildlife markets and humans who come into contact with them. Illegal wildlife markets are therefore not only a conservation and welfare issue, but a public health issue.

The Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention tested 585 samples of wildlife specimens present at the Wuhan's Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market during the course of January and found 33 of these samples contained the coronavirus. In this market, as in so many throughout China, customers could purchase carcasses and live animals from local and international origins. African animals, such as crocodiles and pangolins, are on offer.

Disease is not the only danger consumers face from wildlife products. In Africa, many of the animals that end up in the trade chain are killed using highly toxic pesticides. Residues of these poisons have been detected on animal parts from vultures, leopards, and a range of other species. The EWT works to create awareness of this public health threat to local and international consumers, but this effort must be supported by governments and organisations in the relevant countries, including China. The Chinese government has in recent years taken increasing steps to curb the demand for wildlife products from Africa, which often end up in these wildlife markets. In 2017 the government announced its plans to shut down domestic ivory trade. In 2019, Chinese officials joined African countries in calling for an end to wildlife trafficking.

If the demand for illegal wildlife products persists, and markets go unregulated, populations will continue to be threatened by zoonotic diseases (those that spread between animals and people). These markets threaten the survival of endangered and threatened species and lead to overexploitation of our planet’s limited resources. The closest China has come to closing its wildlife markets was in 2003, following the SARS outbreak that killed almost 800 people. This effort dissipated months later and regulation remained unchanged. Understanding the threats these markets represent to both humans and wildlife, now is the right time for China to announce a permanent ban on wildlife markets.


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Flutterby
Posts: 44150
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:28 pm
Country: South Africa
Location: Gauteng, South Africa
Contact:

Re: WILDLIFE CRIME/TRADE

Post by Flutterby »

Hopefully this will be the start of change! \O


User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67241
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: WILDLIFE CRIME/TRADE

Post by Lisbeth »

If I don't error, that's what we said last time and after a while they withdraw the ban 0*\


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67241
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: WILDLIFE CRIME/TRADE

Post by Lisbeth »

The Endangered Wildlife Trust responds to China’s plans to enforce the ban on illegal wildlife markets

6 February 2020

The Endangered Wildlife Trust (EWT) welcomes the announcement by the Chinese Communist Party to enforce the ban on illegal wildlife trade and increase regulation of wildlife markets. Evidence points to wildlife markets as a source of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), which has resulted in human and economic costs. The EWT emphasises our position that these markets pose serious risks to public safety, conservation, and animal welfare, and we urge the Chinese government to follow-through with its announcement.

On 4 February 2020, the Chinese government announced plans to escalate regulation of wet markets and enforce the ban on illegal wildlife trade. At a meeting of the Chinese Communist Party Politburo Standing Committee, the government issued a statement announcing its determination to “resolutely ban and severely crackdown on illegal wildlife markets and trade,” recognising the threat to public health from these unregulated markets. The EWT sees this as a strong step in the right direction, following the government’s temporary ban on 26 January.

The impact of the 2019-nCoV has extended far beyond the Wuhan province. By 6 February, infection had surpassed 24,500 cases and nearly 500 deaths globally. The World Health Organisation released a USD$675 million Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan outlining activities and resources for the global health community to prepare for and respond to the epidemic. Its far-flung reach is evidence that this zoonotic disease (one that transmits between animals to humans) can spread quickly and broadly.

There have also been detrimental financial costs associated with 2019-nCoV. On Monday 3 February, the Chinese stock markets plunged 8%, wiping out a total $445 billion in market value. While the SARS outbreak of 2003 cost $40 billion, the growth of the Chinese economy over the past 17 years means the impact of 2019-nCoV is much more significant. Some economic forecasters have attempted to quantify the global impact; Oxford Economics predicts annual Chinese economic growth will drop from 6% pre-virus, to 4%. International retailers have closed operations in the country. Corporations with facilities in neighbouring countries, such as Hyundai in South Korea, have halted production. China is a major buyer of industrial commodities, and crude oil and copper have subsequently dropped in price.

The origin of 2019-nCoV was likely Wuhan’s Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market. The Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention tested 585 animal samples from this market and confirmed that 33 contained 2019-nCoV. Initial cases seemed to originate from contact with wildlife kept in unsanitary conditions, and the most likely source was bats. In late January, experts warned that accelerated human-to-human transmission was possible. This was confirmed on 28 January with the first transmission in Germany.

The EWT’s Wildlife in Trade Programme works to address trade-related threats to threatened wildlife. Several threatened and protected species from southern Africa regularly make their way to Chinese markets, where they are sold live or for their parts. Ironically, customers consume thee animals for their supposed health benefits and yet several diseases have now been linked to the consumption of wildlife. In these ‘wet markets’ customers come into close contact with animals such as pangolins, bats, snakes, and many others. The conditions in which the animals are kept has repeatedly been condemned for being inhuman and detrimental to both animal and human welfare.

After the SARS outbreak, the Chinese government lost momentum in its efforts to quell illegal wildlife trade. This must not happen again. Attitudes around wildlife consumption may be slow to change, but a profound move by the Chinese government may help to accelerate this. China could thus prove instrumental in combatting the global illegal wildlife trade. Following its recent announcement, the Chinese government must now present its plan to permanently ban illegal wildlife trade and crack down on market regulation.


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Dindingwe
Posts: 830
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2018 6:13 pm
Country: Bolivia
Location: La Paz
Contact:

Re: WILDLIFE CRIME/TRADE

Post by Dindingwe »

Let's bet that most of the coronavirus victims are Rhino horns consumers :evil:


User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 75838
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: WILDLIFE CRIME/TRADE

Post by Richprins »

Poetic justice! \O


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
Post Reply

Return to “Other Conservation Issues”