SANParks' Corporate Social Investment Programmes

Information and Discussions on Management Issues in SANParks
User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 76370
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: SANParks' Corporate Social Investment Programmes

Post by Richprins »

The mopani worms harvesting project is part of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Protected Areas Act and South African National Parks policy to allow for the sustainable use of certain natural resources.

That is nonsense, and "name dropping".

I doubt whether IUCN has any knowledge of this yearly project!

It is certainly not specifically mentioned in the Protected Areas Act ! 0-

One may peruse the Act here:

http://www.info.gov.za/view/DownloadFileAction?id=67970

SP policy fits in fine, though! \O


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
iNdlovu
Posts: 4319
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 11:58 am
Country: South Africa
Location: Lowveld, South Africa
Contact:

Re: SANParks' Corporate Social Investment Programmes

Post by iNdlovu »

Back to SP's social upliftment program. I notice Mabunda and his cronies refer to the partnership between SP, .Gov, local communities etc, but never once even acknowledges that it is the people of this country and from all over the world that visit our National Parks that are providing the finances, and guess what, a lot of them are probably what he would class as the "elitist, old world, stick in the mud" group that he insults, shows disdain for and generally dislikes.
Shuv it Dr O/


Man was placed in charge and given the duty of caring for all creation, are we doing it?
User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 76370
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: SANParks' Corporate Social Investment Programmes

Post by Richprins »

A letter from S Moore in today's Lowvelder:

(With answer from Mr Mabasa in green)

Image
Image
Image


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
User avatar
Toko
Posts: 26619
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:29 pm
Country: -

Re: SANParks' Corporate Social Investment Programmes

Post by Toko »

Open doors for suggestions \O great to hear, SANParks ^Q^

=O:


User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 76370
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: SANParks' Corporate Social Investment Programmes

Post by Richprins »

SANParks cancelled the collecting of firewood in the bush for picnic spots/camps etc. about 3 decades ago, due the recognition that logs are a major stabilising factor regarding bush rejuvenation...protecting seedlings from herbivores, for example.

That is why gas skottels were introduced to picnic areas years ago, end of story!.....


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
User avatar
H. erectus
Posts: 5851
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:43 pm
Country: South Africa
Contact:

Re: SANParks' Corporate Social Investment Programmes

Post by H. erectus »

When I arrived at open doors ,Groenkloof, they were no where to be seen!!
Matter of fact they were so close, I could smell 'em, yet so far away.


Heh,.. H.e
User avatar
mposthumus
Posts: 976
Joined: Thu May 31, 2012 9:51 pm
Country: South Africa
Location: Pretora
Contact:

Re: SANParks' Corporate Social Investment Programmes

Post by mposthumus »

0*\ 0- In other words . . . . ooooooooooo ê-ê =O: =O: =O:


User avatar
H. erectus
Posts: 5851
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:43 pm
Country: South Africa
Contact:

Re: SANParks' Corporate Social Investment Programmes

Post by H. erectus »

mposthumus wrote: ooooooooooo ê-ê
Bloukop koggelmanders, disappearing in the crags of a tree.

You know they are there but just cannot see them.


Heh,.. H.e
User avatar
H. erectus
Posts: 5851
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:43 pm
Country: South Africa
Contact:

Re: SANParks' Corporate Social Investment Programmes

Post by H. erectus »

Richprins wrote:SANParks cancelled the collecting of firewood in the bush for picnic spots/camps etc. about 3 decades ago, due the recognition that logs are a major stabilising factor regarding bush rejuvenation...protecting seedlings from herbivores
,....

It was quoted in a book that the power lines crossing Kruger have no real impact on the park!!
It could be seen as a mere aesthetics setback.

Yet when looking closely, a whole strip of natural bush was destroyed, to accommodate that power line!!

When going to Kruger I am led to believe that I will be free in the bush,
a wonderful experience!,.. sounds good enough, yet when I travel through the park
I see for endless kilo meters little piles of wood collected, packed at the kerb for collection.

My idea of travel through Kruger always seemed to be a face to face scenario of untouched
natural beauty!!

I guess the integrity value of Kruger has gone and was set aside for a more practical state!!


Heh,.. H.e
User avatar
H. erectus
Posts: 5851
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:43 pm
Country: South Africa
Contact:

Re: SANParks' Corporate Social Investment Programmes

Post by H. erectus »

I really don't need excuses for the past but rather a damn
good reason for the future!!!


Heh,.. H.e
Post Reply

Return to “General Management Issues - SANParks”