Biodiversity

Everything that has to do with the Earth and life on Earth
Post Reply
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 64638
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Biodiversity

Post by Lisbeth »

Swap salmon for sardines to keep four million tonnes of fish in the sea

March 1, 2022 | David Willer
Henslow Research Fellow, Sustainable Seafood, University of Cambridge


Cutting down on meat and dairy is one way to make your diet better for the planet. But when it comes to sustainable seafood, buying sardines instead of salmon for your sandwiches and salads should be your first port of call.

A third of fish stocks are being harvested at rates that exceed what these populations can replenish, and 90% are fished right up to their sustainable limit, according to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization. A leading cause of overfishing is, ironically, the demand for fish feed. Over one-third of all fish caught worldwide are fed to farmed animals instead of people. Fish farming, or aquaculture, is the world’s fastest growing food sector. Most of the Atlantic salmon sold in supermarkets in the UK is farmed.

Rearing these large, predatory fish involves feeding them a diet rich in omega-3 fatty acids and protein, nutrients that are also essential to humans for brain development and nerve function. In a new study, my colleagues and I found that if people ate the wild-caught fish, such as sardines, which are usually destined for salmon farms, it would leave nearly 4 million tonnes of fish in the sea and provide an extra 6 million tonnes of seafood.

Feed people, not fish farms

The sea provides humanity with a bounty of nutrient-rich food, which we have benefited from for thousands of years. Seafood is one of the most easily absorbed sources of key nutrients such as omega-3 and vitamins D and A that humans need. It is believed that a diet that included seafood may have helped humans develop bigger brains. There is a global responsibility to sustainably use this resource, as over 3.3 billion people rely on it as their source of animal protein.

Salmon raised in coastal farms off Scotland is the UK’s largest food export by total annual economic value (followed by bread and pastries). Our research team carried out a thorough assessment of the Scottish salmon industry, collecting data on fish nutrient content, fishmeal and fish oil composition and examining the transfer of micronutrients from feed to fish.

Image
A circular pen containing swimming fish seen from above.
Coastal salmon farms produce a lot of effluent pollution. Russ Heinl/Shutterstock


We found that by removing wild-caught fish from salmon feed and only using fish byproducts instead – such as trimmings and offcuts from the filleting of farmed fish – 3.7 million tonnes of fish could be left in the sea and global annual seafood production could increase by 6.1 million tonnes. Over half of the essential dietary minerals and fatty acids available in wild fish are currently lost to human mouths when these fish are fed to farmed salmon.

By comparing salmon with other options, our research also highlighted the health and environmental benefits of eating more sustainably farmed seafood, such as mussels. Mussels belong to the bivalve class of molluscs that include shellfish like clams and oysters (but not prawns, lobsters or crabs). Our research has shown that mussels are one of the most sustainable foods on the planet, more so than any other meat, fish, and most land-based crops like soya, wheat and rice.

Mussels require no feed, they simply eat algae in the water. The reefs they create act as nurseries where young fish can develop to full size, helping to regenerate wild fish stocks. Bivalve farms use up no land and no freshwater. They actually act as a carbon sink.

Image
A crab rests on an underwater rope covered in mussels.
Mussel farms can provide habitat for other species. A Daily Odyssey/Shutterstock


But what if you like eating salmon? The use of alternative feeds in salmon farms is growing, but some are better than others. Feeds made from crops like soya and corn need a lot of land and water to produce, but those made using algae are richer in omega-3 and use up sea space (of which there is plenty) instead of land. We need more research and investment to produce nutritious seafood while reducing pressure on marine ecosystems.

If you’re ever unsure, there are two simple mnemonics to guide what fish you should buy:

ECOME - Eat clams, oysters and mussels everywhere

SMASH - Sardines, mackerel, anchovies, sprats and herring

So enjoy your moules frites and barbecued sardines. Eat small, oily fish and bivalve shellfish. Eating more of these tasty foods, and foregoing the salmon and tinned tuna, can make a real difference to the ocean.


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 64638
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Environment

Post by Lisbeth »

Biodiversity is in crisis worldwide and time is running out

Image
(Photos: Unsplash / Douglas Bagg / Joshua Cotten / Vincent Van Zalinge / Sebastian Lambarri / Mike Marrah / Peter Burdon)

By Ken Mwathe | 29 Jun 2022

Tackling biodiversity loss requires ambitious political leadership and will from countries. Without this, the world stares into a bleak future.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Nature is at a tipping point. Over the past century, human activities have destroyed nature at an alarming rate. The 2019 Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services highlighted that around one million animal and plant species are at risk of extinction, underlining the precarious situation we humans find ourselves in.

It is a serious indictment on the global community that the Aichi Biodiversity Targets — an ambitious set of global goals aimed at protecting and conserving global biodiversity by 2020 — were not achieved. In the past three years, the focus of governments and non-government stakeholders has been to craft a new framework to save nature in the next decade.

Dubbed the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), the new plan is being negotiated — through a series of working groups and technical consultations — with a view to getting it finalised and endorsed during the 15th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the Convention on Biological Diversity, scheduled for December 2022 in Montreal, Canada (COP15).

Catastrophic failure
The fourth Open Ended Working Group (OEWG 4) held in Nairobi, Kenya, last week has catastrophically failed to agree on text for a new deal for nature.

Government delegations came to Nairobi to agree, among other things, on targets to save species, ensure robust and well-connected ecosystems, include the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities as well as a financing mechanism for implementation.

Image
Delegates during the closing of the 15th Conference of the Parties (COP) of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, 20 May 2022. (Photo: EPA-EFE / Legnan Koula)
However, whereas some progress was made in Nairobi, it was painfully slow across the whole framework, three years after the first working group meeting was held in Nairobi in August 2019.

Also notable is the fact that most of the GBF text across the mission, goals and targets was left in square brackets, signalling a deep lack of consensus among government negotiators in Nairobi. This means that there is still a lot of work for the parties and stakeholders ahead of Montreal to “lift the brackets”, as many civil society organisations are now calling for.

COP15 Montreal

Ahead of COP15 in Montreal, nothing short of high-level political intervention will unlock the deadlock, which — in one part — is driven by countries looking only at their national interests, rather than the good of nature and humanity.

We call upon world leaders to prioritise nature and push for an ambitious deal at COP15. Anything short of that will be disastrous since the biodiversity crisis is linked to the climate crisis.

As Melanie Heath, BirdLife’s Director for Science Policy and Information notes, “there are five months to COP15 and momentum has to build dramatically — everyone must feel the heat and act and inject a sense of urgency and all government leaders must place much greater attention and priority on the negotiations to work.

“There is no doubt that this is a critical moment for nature, where inaction will have serious implications on the future of humanity.

“While the world’s attention is on the impacts of climate change, it is critically important that world leaders and the global community realise that climate and the biodiversity crisis are inextricably linked — nature is impacted by climate change, but is also part of the solution.”

Species loss

An ambitious GBF should address species loss and address factors that drive species towards extinction. Second, there is a need to put in place a GBF that places emphasis on expanding and effectively managing protected and conserved areas. This should be coupled with holistic spatial planning and ensuring connectivity.

For this purpose, the role of Key Biodiversity Areas as a global standard for identifying conservation priorities should be recognised. Linked to this is the critical role of indigenous people and local communities (IPLCs) who number about 476 million people — about 6% of the global population, but inhabit about 85% of areas proposed for biodiversity conservation.

IPLCs are critical partners in helping achieve protection of 30% of the planet’s land and ocean areas by 2030.

Working with partners including local communities through its “local to global” partnership model, BirdLife has achieved significant conservation successes and thus the consensus at the Nairobi meeting on acknowledging the critical role played by IPLCs is commendable.

Finally, the means of implementation are critical for effective implementation of the GBF. This includes a clear monitoring and reporting framework.

Critically, predictable financing must be made available to implement the GBF. Africa faces a huge shortfall in financing biodiversity conservation estimated at about $700-billion annually, thus addressing how to finance this gap is imperative.

Image
White-fronted plovers’ numbers are down on this Plettenberg Bay beach. Dogs and foot-traffic present unintended yet major challenges to the beach’s biodiversity. (Photo: Angus Begg)

Political support from countries is also key. Tackling biodiversity loss requires ambitious political leadership and will from countries, without which the world stares into a bleak future.

With the missed opportunity in Nairobi, a robust commitment is urgently needed ahead of Montreal.

Time is ticking.

As parties and stakeholders spend time in plenary halls debating a word here and a bracket there, the next species is slowly being pushed towards extinction.

Only a bold commitment through an ambitious GBF will reverse this and put the world on a nature-positive trajectory.

The next five months are going to be critical in starting the journey to achieve this. DM/OBP

Ken Mwathe is the Policy and Communications Coordinator, BirdLife International Africa Office, Nairobi.


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 73770
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: Environment

Post by Richprins »

0:


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 64638
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Biodiversity

Post by Lisbeth »

South Africa’s global biodiversity ranks as nothing too special

Image
Red macau in brazil. (Photo:The Swiftest report)

By Don Pinnock | 13 Sep 2022

Biodiversity is fundamental to human wellbeing and a healthy planet, but it’s deteriorating worldwide. So how is South Africa shaping up compared to the rest of the world?
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
South Africa’s Draft White Paper on the Sustainable Use of Biodiversity begins with an assumption that we’re one of the most biodiverse countries in the world. But we’re not as biologically endowed as we think.

A report just released by US risk analyst Matthew Nash – The 200 Most and Least Biodiverse Countries in 2022 – places South Africa way below Brazil, but also shows we’re a lot less diverse than Indonesia, Colombia, China, Mexico, Australia, India, the US, Tanzania or the DRC. The ratings include birds, mammals, fish, amphibians, reptiles and plants.

Image
From the 200 Most and Least Biodiverse Countries in 2022 – The Swiftest Report

Over the past century, says the report – issued by the data company Swiftest – the world has seen an unprecedented decline in biodiversity, triggered by climate change, habitat loss, overexploitation, pollution and pesticides. This prompted Nash’s team to take a deep dive into how nations rank in terms of biodiversity, using all available sources.

It was a difficult exercise. “Many countries have conflicting data reports, under-reporting, or simply lack reporting when it comes to the various species,” Nash writes. “Additionally, new species are being identified yearly, and others are dying out at alarming rates.”

Image
Tiger-leg monkey frog. (Photo:The Swiftest report)

Most biodiverse, most populated

An interesting observation was that some of the most biodiverse countries are also the most populated, while many other extremely biodiverse countries are spending the least on conservation.

Brazil is an example of the latter. It tops the list as the most megadiverse place on Earth, with 1,816 bird species, 1,141 amphibians, 4,738 fish, 693 mammals, 847 reptiles and 34,387 plant species. However it permits massive destruction of its precious rainforest, home to an estimated 20% of the world’s total biodiversity, with new native species being discovered all the time.

Countries with the lowest biodiversity are, understandably, extremely small ones, or island states such as San Marino, Monaco, Kiribati, Luxemburg and the Comoros, as well as mostly frozen countries such as Iceland. Surprisingly, no African country features in the top five of any of the six species categories.

Australia tops the list of reptiles (1,131) and fish (4,992) species, while Indonesia has the greatest variety of mammals (729). However, the Amazon puts Brazil ahead on plant species (34,387), followed by China (31,362).

Image
A toucan on a branch in Colombia. (Photo:The Swiftest report)

By comparison, South Africa has 762 birds, 132 amphibians, 2,094 fish, 331 mammals, 421 reptiles and 21,250 plants.

The biggest threats to biodiversity, says the report, are rising global temperatures, habitat loss, overexploitation and pollution. According to the WWF, the loss of species we are experiencing today is somewhere between 1,000 and 10,000 times greater than the natural extinction rate.

“While we don’t know exactly how many species of plants and animals are out there, a low estimate is that we could be losing 200 to 2,000 species every year, while a high estimate is between 10,000 and 100,000.”

Image
Deforestation of the Amazon rainforest in Brazil. (Photo:The Swiftest report)

Research has shown that the degeneration of wildlife could lead to more disease outbreaks. As humans travel deeper into nature, we increase our risk of exposure to pathogens carried by wild animals. Many recent viral disease outbreaks can be traced back to wildlife.

In general, biodiversity is ailing. In 2011, the UN Convention on Biological Diversity set 20 targets that needed to be urgently implemented by 2020 (the so-called Aichi Biodiversity Targets). These included biodiversity values being included in national and local planning, actions harmful to biodiversity being eliminated, habitat loss halved, overfishing avoided, pollution and pressure on coral reefs reduced, 10% of coastal waters protected, extinction of species halted and genetic diversity enhanced.

Image
Clown fish in Great Barrier Reef. Photo: The Swiftest report

Only six of 20 targets

By 2020, only six goals had been partially achieved. The other 14, such as eliminating subsidies driving biodiversity loss, or halving the rate at which natural habitats are being lost, had been completely missed.

“Plant and animal species support the ecosystems we rely on,” says the Swiftest report. “They aid in pollination, soil fertility, food and medicine production, air quality and much more. Losing too many species would negatively affect the balance of our world.

Image
An anteater in Mexico. (Photo: The Swiftest report)

“Keeping our planet biodiverse can also help slow the effects of climate change. For instance, when forests are cut down at unsustainable levels, we’re removing our natural defence against excessive carbon dioxide in our atmosphere. The Amazon has long been referred to as the ​‘lungs of the Earth’ since the incredibly diverse plant species are constantly sequestering carbon and producing oxygen.”

In another survey on the best and worst countries for animal rights, South Africa came in at 51 of 67. The top 10 countries were all in Europe. On dog-friendly countries, Italy came out tops, followed by New Zealand, France and the UK. South Africa was at 32 of 51, with Vietnam and China at the bottom. DM/OBP


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
Post Reply

Return to “Natural World”