Pilanesberg-Madikwe Corridor jeopardised ???
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:31 pm
‘Misfiling’ snare in North West game corridor plan
‘Misfiling’ snare in North West game corridor plan
BY SUE BLAINE, 11 JANUAR 2013, 07:08
BUREAUCRATIC technicalities could sink a proposed game corridor between North West’s Pilanesberg and Madikwe parks.
The Federation for a Sustainable Environment (FSE) has claimed the corridor is jeopardised by mining activity.
The Department of Mineral Resources — which gave the go-ahead last year to changes to mining company Platmin’s post-operations land rehabilitation programme — said on Thursday that it was unable to officially deal with an appeal by the environmental group as it had not lodged it properly.
The group alleged that the corridor, agreed to in a 2005 deal between the North West Parks Board and Platmin, would no longer be viable due to the extent of mining activities by Platmin — and other miners — in the area.
FSE CEO Mariette Liefferink said on Thursday she was "perplexed" by the department’s claim as she had filed the appeal in the same way she had filed many previous appeals.
She had an e-mail from the department’s legal services directorate acknowledging receipt of the appeal, she said.
"If it wasn’t done correctly, why didn’t they tell us? We’ve had no correspondence," she said.
The appeal was lodged early last month, and the FSE paid R500 to lodge it. Business Day has seen the receipt.
The group claimed the changes Platmin had been allowed to make to its environmental management plan effectively meant that the game corridor would not be feasible because it would be only 200m wide in places — not wide enough to allow the safe passage of dangerous animals. The two parks are home to the "big five": lions, buffalo, elephants, leopards and rhinos.
Department spokeswoman Zingaphi Jakuja said it gave Platmin the go-ahead to flood the mine pit instead of backfilling and rehabilitating the land when its open-cast pit mining operations ceased. This was because Platmin had properly consulted with "interested and affected parties", including the landowner, the Bakgatla Ba Kgafela, who backed the miner’s changes.
The Bakgatla Ba Kgafela’s status as landowner is the subject of a dispute that has made it to the Constitutional Court.
Ms Liefferink said the FSE was a listed interested and affected party and neither it, nor several local communities had been properly consulted.
North West Parks Board CEO Alan Losaba said he was not aware of any dam planned for the corridor. Even so, a dam’s presence did not mean the corridor was jeopardised, he said.
Platmin said the pit flooding would create "a substantial water capture and storage facility in this water-scarce area".
But the FSE said it would narrow the corridor, hurting its tourism and conservation potential, and reducing the availability of water for farming and for local communities.
© BDlive 2012