Logging in the Garden Route National Park

Information and Discussion on Development Plans in National Parks
User avatar
H. erectus
Posts: 5851
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:43 pm
Country: South Africa
Contact:

Re: Logging in the Garden Route National Park

Post by H. erectus »

Richprins wrote:The questions regarding the logging were sent to Parliament, H.e., and we sort of got a reply there...
Legally SanParks can do what they want, quote]
I hear what you say RP. It just seems ludicrous to
fell age old trees!! How many and for what reason?

Maybe I'm wrong, but doubt it!


Heh,.. H.e
User avatar
Bushcraft
Posts: 13359
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 2:59 pm
Location: KZN, South Africa
Contact:

Re: Logging in the Garden Route National Park

Post by Bushcraft »

H. erectus wrote:It just seems ludicrous to
fell age old trees!! How many and for what reason?
For money!! Why else -O-


User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 76096
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: Logging in the Garden Route National Park

Post by Richprins »

Ok, got a bit of response...more time required!

The thing is, SanParks read everything said here, so timing is everything! O**


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
User avatar
Sprocky
Posts: 7121
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:29 pm
Country: South Africa
Location: Grietjie Private Reserve
Contact:

Re: Logging in the Garden Route National Park

Post by Sprocky »

Richprins wrote:The thing is, SanParks read everything said here, so timing is everything! O**
I don't blame them, it's a hell of a lot better than their own forum. ;-)


Sometimes it’s not until you don’t see what you want to see, that you truly open your eyes.
User avatar
Toko
Posts: 26619
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:29 pm
Country: -

Re: Logging in the Garden Route National Park

Post by Toko »

From the new Management Plan for GRNP (p. 74) Download PDF
4.3 SUSTAINABLE USE OF NATURAL RESOURCES

4.3.1 Terrestrial

Extractive resource use from terrestrial ecosystems is an important component of the management of the Garden Route National Park. This is both from the historical perspective as well as to comply with policy directives to accommodate the need for access to resources, to optimise socio-economic benefits to neighbouring communities, and to generate income for the organisation. The resource use programme makes provision for the harvesting of timber and non-timber forest products, as well as the harvesting of fynbos products. The area zoned for extractive resource use includes a diversity of vegetation types to allow for the harvesting of a wide range of species and products.

Timber
Timber from the indigenous forests is used mainly for the manufacture of high quality furniture and ornaments, in an industry that is important in the local economy. Approximately 9 200 ha of the indigenous forest area is allocated to the timber utilisation management class. Biodiversity conservation remains the primary aim of management in these areas, so a yield regulation system was developed that has minimum ecological impacts, causes minimum deviation from the natural turnover and disturbance mechanisms of the forests and produces an optimal sustainable yield. Specialised harvesting techniques and equipment are used to limit damage to the forest.

Timber yield regulation
The timber yield regulation system and its implementation are described in detail by, amongst others, Seydack (1995), Seydack et al. (1995) and Durrheim (2000). Harvesting takes place on a 10-year cycle and is limited to forest types and sites that are the least ecologically sensitive. Individual trees are selected for harvesting according to the locally developed Senility Criteria Harvesting (SCH) yield regulation system, which is based on natural mortality patterns. The system aims to pre-empt, and thus utilise natural mortality, resulting in the harvesting of the most senile trees. Individual trees are selected for harvesting by applying selection criteria that are based on external, visible signs of senility, declining vigour and low future life expectancy. The criteria are described for each of the main canopy species, and are calibrated to the natural senility patterns as determined by long-term research results. Trees falling within the selection criteria are marked for removal by trained markers if they can provide marketable utilisable timber.

Timber harvesting
Reduced-impact logging techniques were introduced into the southern Cape forests in the 1960s and have been applied consistently since the early 1980s. There has since been a continuous development and improvement in techniques and equipment. A comprehensive timber harvesting policy and guidelines document that addresses all aspects of timber harvesting has been compiled. Measures applied to reduce the impacts of timber harvesting include the following:
● No harvesting is carried out in ecologically sensitive areas.
● Large crowns are removed before trees are felled, a procedure known as topping.
● Logs are slipped out of the forest with horses or winches.
● Large, specially designed machinery is only used on the main slipping paths.
● Slipping of logs is only carried out when the soils are sufficiently dry.
The harvested timber is taken to depots where it is usually sold on public auction, sometimes on tender.

Monitoring
Long term monitoring of yields, growth rates and regeneration is important to ensure that harvest levels and mixes of products are sustainable. The effects of timber harvesting are monitored in timber utilisation areas by means of permanent sample plots, full count monitoring and post-harvest audits.

By-products from timber harvesting
Much potential exists for the harvesting of plant products as by-products from timber harvesting areas. This includes, for example, the harvesting of tree seedlings from forest roads (that would get damaged during harvesting operations) for establishment in indigenous trees nurseries, and the harvesting of timber off-cuts (branch wood and logs of small dimensions are not harvested during normal timber harvesting operations) for carving and turning. In addition, the bark of many timber species (e.g. Curtisia dentata, Rapanea melanophloeos and Pterocelastrus tricuspidatus) is also in demand for medicinal use. During harvesting operations only the utilisable timber is extracted for the furniture timber market. Owing to quality specifications for most furniture timber, branchwood and logs of small dimensions are not harvested, and bark for medicinal use could be stripped from the remaining wood. These, and other options would be explored, as needs for access to products are identified.


User avatar
H. erectus
Posts: 5851
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:43 pm
Country: South Africa
Contact:

Re: Logging in the Garden Route National Park

Post by H. erectus »

Bushcraft wrote:For money!! Why else
So tempted I am for another thread but no, 'cause
it will be abused!!!


Heh,.. H.e
User avatar
Toko
Posts: 26619
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:29 pm
Country: -

Re: Logging in the Garden Route National Park

Post by Toko »

Indigenous timber auction

The long-awaited auction of indigenous hardwood timber harvested from state forests was held at Buffels Rivier in the southern Cape. The auction was organised by KwaKhanyisa Co-operative Ltd, which has been awarded a contract to harvest and sell timber from the natural forests in the Garden Route National Park which are managed by SANParks, following a lengthy tender process.
The last auction of indigenous hardwood and blackwood logs by SANParks was held in May 2010. SANParks announced then that they intended to restructure the harvesting and auctioning system that had been in place since they took over management of the southern Cape natural forests in 2005. The decision to outsource was made to enable SANParks to focus on its core conservation activities.
The auction was attended by around 10 local furniture-making businesses and timber merchants operating mainly in the Knysna area. Some of these businesses are members of the Southern Cape Timber Buyers’ Co-operative, which was one of the bidders for the harvesting and marketing contract. Also in attendance were a number of stakeholders, including members of SANParks.
There was 216 cubic metres of timber up for sale at the auction, including Yellowwood, Ironwood, Red Alder, Hard Pear, White Pear, Candlewood, Stinkwood and Blackwood. The reserve prices varied from R4 200/cubic metre for A-grade Outeniqua and Real Yellowwood (Podocarpus falcatus and P. latifolius) to R2 600/cubic metre for M-grade Ironwood (Olea capensis) and R2 800/cubic metre for M-grade Hard Pear (Olinia ventosa).
Ironically, one of the biggest sellers was Blackwood (Acacia melanoxylon), which is derived from a non-indigenous tree that was actively introduced into the southern Cape’s Afromontane forests in the early 1900s. A-grade Blackwood fetched a price of R4 400/cubic metre, and M-grade Blackwood went for R3 400/cubic metre, following some keen bidding from buyers. Blackwood is an aggressive invader of open land and disturbed forests, but does not aggressively invade closed evergreen forests. It produces high quality wood with many applications.
Despite the fact that there has not been an auction for almost three years, it was somewhat surprising that much of the timber offered at the auction was not sold. In terms of the contract with SANParks, 80% of the timber harvested by KwaKhanyisa must first be offered for sale at an auction that is open to the public. The timber that is not sold at the auction, together with the other 20% of the timber, can then be sold directly to buyers. Thus, many of the buyers who attended the auction were busy negotiating to purchase the unsold timber immediately after the auction was completed. According to KwaKhanyisa general manager Ivor Masters, around 70% of the timber was eventually sold.
This was the first timber auction held by KwaKhanyisa following the award of the contract by SANParks. KwaKhanyisa was established by two of the original bidders for the contract who decided to join forces, combining forestry, environmental and marketing expertise with a community development component. The directors of KwaKhanyisa are Dr Ntombikayise Giba, Noksie Kolwapi, Dr Lesley Masters, Deborah Matsolo and Ivor Masters.
KwaKhanyisa has subcontracted the harvesting to Peter Boshoff of Treepro. The harvesting is done with great care to avoid compacting the sensitive forest floor and damaging surrounding trees. Trees earmarked for harvesting by SANParks are dismantled with chainsaws and then winched to the extraction routes. Once the harvesting team has finished working in one area of the forest, they are not allowed back there for 10 years.
The KwaKhanyisa team has plans to utilise harvested timber, including branches, in various downstream projects aimed at providing business opportunities and creating jobs for local communities. Dr Giba said that the branches would be used as raw material for a furniture and crafts project that has the potential to create 60 jobs. Other projects in the pipeline include a sawmill, utilisation of the bark for medicinal purposes, and additional manufacturing projects.
Ivor Masters said that the Garden Route National Park forests cover 66 000 ha, with 17% of it demarcated for harvesting. In terms of the contract, KwaKhanyisa can harvest 3 000 cubic metres of timber a year, which will create around 60 jobs as it is very labour intensive. The contract has been awarded for a period of 10 years.
The next timber auction is scheduled to take place in the second half of 2013.
The only other sources of locally grown indigenous hardwood timber in South Africa are Parkes’ forest and Hooggekraal, which are owned and managed by Geo Parkes & Sons (Pty) Ltd, one of Knysna’s oldest timber businesses. They have a special permit to harvest indigenous tree species and negotiate prices directly with buyers, according to Managing Director Jim Parkes.

Published in April 2013


User avatar
H. erectus
Posts: 5851
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:43 pm
Country: South Africa
Contact:

Re: Logging in the Garden Route National Park

Post by H. erectus »

Toko wrote:Despite the fact that there has not been an auction for almost three years, it was somewhat surprising that much of the timber offered at the auction was not sold.
How fast would they prefer these to grow???
Toko wrote:Ironically, one of the biggest sellers was Blackwood (Acacia melanoxylon), which is derived from a non-indigenous tree that was actively introduced into the southern Cape’s Afromontane forests in the early 1900s. A-grade Blackwood fetched a price of R4 400/cubic metre, and M-grade Blackwood went for R3 400/cubic metre, following some keen bidding from buyers. Blackwood is an aggressive invader of open land and disturbed forests, but does not aggressively invade closed evergreen forests. It produces high quality wood with many applications.
Known as firewood for braaing purposes!!!
Toko wrote:as it is very labour intensive. The contract has been awarded for a period of 10 years.
Polilitical affirmation, 60 jobs for ten years!!!??? Gee what a great success story in the making!!!


At the timber yards!!!, old fashioned plain oak goes for R16,000.00 +per cube at least!!!!

What a downplay! Do we really have such little respect and regard for our indigenous forests???
Why the harvest anyway??? Building a road, maybe another hotel!!!


0*\ Man I should have invested into raw lumber those years back!!!


Heh,.. H.e
User avatar
H. erectus
Posts: 5851
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:43 pm
Country: South Africa
Contact:

Re: Logging in the Garden Route National Park

Post by H. erectus »

Raw lumber seems better than gold or diamonds for investment
purpose!!!!


Heh,.. H.e
User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 76096
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: Logging in the Garden Route National Park

Post by Richprins »

So 70% of 216 cubes was sold, at an average of, let's be generous, R3000 per cube...

That's R453 600 max?

I doubt whetherthat would even cover the salaries of the 60 workers, and I doubt whether those jobs are permanent? -O-


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
Post Reply

Return to “Proposed Developments in National Parks”