PROTECTED AREAS

[Lisbeth]

INCREDIBLE!

That something like the above can happen in SA, says a lot about which kind of country it has become

[Richprins]

BLF is a horribly racist organisation, and notice how the developer pulls the race card when he cannot break the law as he wants. Meanwhile it is all about grabbing money, as always. They don't care two hoots about the environment.

[Lisbeth]

The whole setup is so obviously fake, that anybody should understand it I have not understood what he is up to, but probably once obtained the
go-ahead the whole thing ill be worth gold and can be sold to a real property developer for a fortune.

• We are talking to government as black people in poverty and in business – that open land must be given to us. We’ve been waiting too long.”

In which world is he living?

[Lisbeth]

MARINE CONSERVATION VICTORY

Landmark De Hoop Marine Protected Area conviction sets precedent for environmental accountability


A pregnant bronze whaler shark being processed aboard the White Rose, a Unathi Wena Vessel. Photo taken by a previous crewman. (Photo: Supplied)

By Julia Evans | 03 Dec 2024

For the first time, the state successfully convicted a fishing company not only for illegal fishing within a Marine Protected Area but also for causing environmental damage, resulting in a R1-million fine and signalling a tougher stance on marine conservation enforcement.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
In a historic verdict delivered on 27 November, the Bredasdorp Regional Court in the Western Cape handed down a landmark ruling against Gqeberha-based fishing company Unathi-Wena Fishing, marking the first conviction for environmental degradation linked to illegal fishing within a Marine Protected Area (MPA).


Crewmen on the White Rose pull a spearnose skate from the water, classified as endangered at a global level in 2006. De Hoop Marine Protected Area, 10 May 2019. (Photo: Supplied)

This precedent-setting case signals a tougher stance on fisheries violating MPA laws, potentially reshaping how marine conservation is enforced in South Africa.

As Daily Maverick previously reported, this case is significant because it’s the first time the state pursued charges related to environmental damage caused by illegal fishing in an MPA, carrying a much higher potential fine than previous offences.

In May 2019, the White Rose, a vessel operated by Unathi-Wena Fishing, was caught fishing illegally within the De Hoop MPA, a no-take zone. Photographic evidence shows fishermen pulling out several fish, including sharks and rays, some of which are endangered.

Index cards

What's an MPA?


A school of yellowtail in the De Hoop Marine Protected Area in the Western Cape. (Photo: Steve Benjamin)

A Marine Protected Area (MPA) is an area of coastline or ocean that is specifically protected for the benefit of people and nature. These areas in the ocean (including estuaries) restrict human activity primarily for biodiversity conservation purposes, whilst delivering social, cultural and economic benefits.

MPAs can be fully, highly, lightly or minimally protected – from no extractive or destructive activities allowed, to some extraction and impacts allowed. But people can typically still dive, walk, swim and do a wide range of non-consumptive and non-damaging activities in MPAs.

How much of SA's Waters are protected?


Forty-one of South Africa’s MPAs are dotted along the coastline. The 42nd is in the Southern Ocean. (Map: DFFE)

Technically, 14.5% of South African waters are considered to be under protection, but most of that comprises the large Prince Edwards Islands MPA. If you discount that, only 5.4% of South Africa’s continental marine waters are protected today.

The spatial protection of South Africa’s ocean environment used to be at just 0.4%, but in 2019, the DFFE declared 20 new offshore MPAs, bringing the total up to 42 MPAs (and 5.4% protection).

What's a No Take Zone?


A "No-Take" sign inside Tsitsikamma National Park, Western Cape. (Photo: Anne / Something Over Tea blog)

A no-take zone / Marine Protected Area, is where all forms of fishing and resource extraction are completely prohibited, as seen in the De Hoop MPA, which is designated as a restricted zone, making it illegal to commercially fish there at any time.

Source: South African Association for Marine Biological Research. • Infographic: Julia Evans

During the trial in 2022, the State alleged that the fishing company not only violated fishing laws, but also caused potential harm to the marine ecosystem by fishing inside the MPA.

The defence argued that the fishing activity didn’t harm the environment, while the prosecution presented expert testimony from marine biologists and fisheries researchers, highlighting the crucial ecological role of MPAs and the detrimental effects of removing protected species such as sharks.

Read about the significance of the case in Daily Maverick: Landmark verdict expected over illegal fishing inside Marine Protected Areas

Although the company pleaded guilty to fishing inside an MPA under the Marine Living Resources Act – an offence carrying a maximum fine of R800,000 or two years’ imprisonment – for the first time, the State pursued an additional charge under the National Environmental Management Act. This law penalises actions likely to detrimentally affect the environment, with fines of up to R5-million.


A ragged tooth shark that was killed, jaw taken and dumped by the White Rose, a Unathi Wena Fishing vessel. (Photo: Supplied)

Finally, on 27 November, the verdict was released. The Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment confirmed the court had found Unathi-Wena Fishing guilty on all counts.

Imraan Patel, the chief operations manager of Unathi-Wena Fishing, testified in mitigation of sentence.

The accused were convicted and sentenced for illegally fishing inside the MPA and fined R150,000. But the landmark ruling – the accused were also found guilty of committing “any act or omission which detrimentally affects or is likely to detrimentally affect the environment,” resulting in a R2-million fine, with R1-million suspended.

Dr Enrico Gennari, a marine ecologist from the Oceans Research Institute in Mossel Bay, welcomed the judgment, saying, “A multimillion-rand fine shows the court’s recognition of the seriousness of this offence.”

Setting a precedent

“This will definitely set a precedent for South Africa and even globally,” Pierre de Villiers, senior manager of marine and coasts operations at CapeNature told Daily Maverick. De Hoop MPA is overseen by CapeNature, a Western Cape entity.

“I think this is the first time that species living in the ocean are not only being considered of any value if they are food for humans,” he said.

“This is the first time that species have been recognised for their vital role in a functioning ecosystem. That value is incredibly important and probably will outweigh the value of that same animal as just food for humans.”

As Daily Maverick previously reported, based on the State witnesses’ expert testimonies – MPAs serve as safe havens for various species, allowing fish populations to regenerate and thrive without the pressures of overfishing.


Drone shot of the White Rose as it leaves the De Hoop Marine Protected Area, off the eastern boundary, in 2020. This photo shows an endangered hammerhead shark, landed alive and not returned to the ocean. (Photo: Supplied)

This is particularly important as many fish stocks globally are under threat from unsustainable fishing practices, leading to declines in species such as sharks and rays, which play vital roles in maintaining the ecological balance. So by restricting human activities like commercial fishing, MPAs help preserve genetic diversity and the overall resilience of marine life, which is essential for adapting to environmental changes.

“The court outcome is a welcome deterrent against practices that undermine current successful efforts to conserve our marine wildlife and biodiversity through establishment of marine protected areas,” JP Louw, Head of Communications at SANParks told Daily Maverick.

“This is particularly important as this case involves a corporate fishing operation player who now faces punishment for disregarding South Africa’s world-renowned approach to conservation management.”

Overall protection

While this case prosecuted a fishing company, many marine biologists (and State witnesses) hail this a win for the fisheries industry too.

During the trial, UCT fisheries professor Colin Attwood explained that by limiting the number of fish that can be extracted from the ocean, MPAs help ensure the productivity of fisheries. Overfishing can deplete fish stocks to levels where they are unable to replenish their losses themselves or provide economic benefits.

During testimonies, officials noted that South Africa’s fish stocks are under significant pressure from exploitation. However, they highlighted that rulings like this reflected a growing recognition by the courts of the constitutional rights of law-abiding fishermen, quota holders and the broader public to benefit from sustainable marine resources.

Such sentences, therefore, are intended to serve as a strong deterrent against illegal activities in MPAs.

“These broad ecosystems are in actual fact what sustain the human race and, obviously, all the species inside,” said de Villiers, emphasising the interconnectedness of human, animal and environmental health—a principle central to the global “One Health” approach.

This case is a good example of the “One Health” approach because illegal fishing practices not only threaten marine biodiversity – such as endangered shark and ray species – but also affect communities that rely on healthy fish populations for their livelihoods.

“So, the bigger picture is now being looked at and I find this exciting from an enforcement, monitoring and holistic ecosystem management perspective,” said de Villiers.

“I would even go so far as to suggest that multi-species fisheries models are introduced by the scientists who manage the fish stocks so that we can get a more balanced quota that provides for humans as well as for the ecosystem.” DM

[Richprins]

Brilliant news this! We need more protected areas where fish stocks can recover!

[Lisbeth]

Not only, also on land.