Astrophotography

Discuss the technical side of photography
User avatar
PRWIN
Posts: 2293
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 7:38 am
Contact:

Re: Astrophotography

Post by PRWIN »

ExFmem I have tried it with the 20D and it jammed the camera up in such away that I ended the sequence by putting the camera off. The in Noise function on the camera takes up a lot of processing time . It is quicker and faster to do it out of camera through different techniques than trying to do it in camera. I have found this out through experience and also what I have read . maybe some one else has found it to be different -O- -O- -O-

Peter great shots


http://prwinnan.wix.com/prwinnan-photography
ExFmem
Posts: 4552
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 6:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Astrophotography

Post by ExFmem »

0/0 Thanks for the info. PRWIN, your input is much appreciated....after all, I've SEEN your photography skills at work! ^Q^


Peter Connan
Posts: 435
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 7:05 pm
Country: South Africa
Contact:

Re: Astrophotography

Post by Peter Connan »

ExFmem wrote:Exquisite!

Do any of you (currently or in the past) use the custom function noise reduction setting in the camera? Is it worth the extra time it takes for the camera to take the second exposure in order to subtract/reduce noise, or is it just as easy to do it during post processing? :-? Thanks.
I usually take strings of shots with the intention of also doing star trials and a timelapse video, and then one can't have big gaps in the middle due to long-exposure NR.

Also, I have been lucky that my cameras don't generate a lot of long-exposure noise.


User avatar
PRWIN
Posts: 2293
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 7:38 am
Contact:

Re: Astrophotography

Post by PRWIN »

Another form is this , there are two ways to do it. One in camera where you leave your shutter open for +_ 60 minutes to get the same effect. This was only done for 16 minutes 20 sec. There are 29 photo's combined with a 5 sec delay between photo's. You can see there is not a constant flow on the stars, Maybe one long shot would be better if there was no light



Taken at 28mm for 30sec at f4 ,ISO 500. Maybe if I dropped the ISO more to about 50 and increased the shutter to about 90 sec it might have helped -O- -O-

Processed in Photoshop in layers, combining the lot into one single photo using this method http://www.digitalcameraworld.com/2012/ ... -photoshop HDR and the normal then added for effect
Last edited by PRWIN on Tue Nov 10, 2020 7:14 am, edited 1 time in total.


http://prwinnan.wix.com/prwinnan-photography
Peter Connan
Posts: 435
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 7:05 pm
Country: South Africa
Contact:

Re: Astrophotography

Post by Peter Connan »

PR, indeed it can be done with longer exposures.

However, I find that each time I try a really long exposure, some inconsiderate person pollutes with light and the shot is ruined...


User avatar
PJL
Posts: 2807
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:12 am
Country: South Africa
Location: Port Elizabeth
Contact:

Re: Astrophotography

Post by PJL »

Some really great night time photos here ^Q^ ^Q^


User avatar
Flutterby
Posts: 43938
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:28 pm
Country: South Africa
Location: Gauteng, South Africa
Contact:

Re: Astrophotography

Post by Flutterby »

PRWIN and Peter Connan - really great shots. \O


User avatar
PRWIN
Posts: 2293
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 7:38 am
Contact:

Re: Astrophotography

Post by PRWIN »

8F5C9578 as Smart Object-1-2.jpg
_F5D7938 as Smart Object-1-2.jpg
_F5F0723-Edit as Smart Object-1-2.jpg


http://prwinnan.wix.com/prwinnan-photography
User avatar
PRWIN
Posts: 2293
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 7:38 am
Contact:

Re: Astrophotography

Post by PRWIN »

Camping under the stars
8F5C9583 as Smart Object-1-2-2.jpg
_F5F2055 as Smart Object-1-2.jpg


http://prwinnan.wix.com/prwinnan-photography
User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 75557
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: Astrophotography

Post by Richprins »

^Q^ ^Q^ ^Q^ Peter!!


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
Post Reply

Return to “Technical Photography Discussion Forum”