Page 205 of 280
Re: Tuskers of Kruger Discussions & Identification
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 9:04 pm
by nan
Re: Tuskers of Kruger Discussions & Identification
Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2017 12:08 am
by aat
Sad to get the confirmation that Masthulele has passed away.
Not a surprise because he hasn't been seen for a very long time. The last pictures on my site (made december 2015) showed him very thin and are probably the last pictures of him. He died somewhere in 2016. Real cause will be unknown , some say because of a bull fight but looking at the last pictures of him he was thin and weak.
Tusk info:
Left
Length (cm) 234cm
Mass (kg) 51kg
Circumference at Lip (cm) 49.5cm
Right
Length (cm) 245cm
Mass (kg) 54kg
Circumference at Lip (cm) 49.5cm
I only can say R.I.P. and it also motivates me to go on with the tuskers with special focus on the Potential ones to get them documented and follow them as long as possible.
Next to Masthulele I also think that several other tuskers have been passed away like Nwashinangana.
Last picture of Masthulele made in december 2015:
-

-
I saw him in May 2011 just in front of the restaurant in Letaba.
-

-
Re: Tuskers of Kruger Discussions & Identification
Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2017 8:21 am
by nan
thank you for all the info here

Re: Tuskers of Kruger Discussions & Identification
Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2017 8:39 am
by okie
Yes , I agree with you aat

He was quite emaciated

Re: Tuskers of Kruger Discussions & Identification
Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2017 9:54 am
by Lisbeth
He really looks bad off in the first pinture and like Okie I think that you are right. Nobody would pick a fight with someone looking like that

Re: Tuskers of Kruger Discussions & Identification
Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2017 10:25 am
by Richprins
Thanks, aat!

Ja, very sick...

Re: Tuskers of Kruger Discussions & Identification
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2017 8:40 pm
by 100ponder
KNP staff find a set of very big tusks in the bush, they cannot ID the tusks (why not ?), they cart the tusks to the ivory store for safe keeping where the tusks have been gathering dust for months - mmmm, I see. . . . .
I would have thought such extraordinary tusks are worth displaying in the museum ? ?
Maybe I am wrong to expect SANPARKS to recognise such tusks as VERY special and worth preserving as a South African heritage item?
Does storing such tusks in the ivory store together with hundreds of other “pick-up” tusks equate to them having been destined to become part of the next ivory sale ?
( To become trinkets in Vietnam or China ?)
HEY ! ! ! - I an talking about Masthulele's tusks ! ! !
PS :-
And people feel sad about a big tusker that was hunted in Zambia, at least that tusker will be remembered and the tusks will be preserved for prosperity.
( See page 21 of the “Africa's Giant Tuskers Thread”.)
Re: Tuskers of Kruger Discussions & Identification
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 10:28 am
by Lisbeth
Ignorance must be reigning in Kruger among the people on the ground

Re: Tuskers of Kruger Discussions & Identification
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 1:13 pm
by okie
100ponder wrote:KNP staff find a set of very big tusks in the bush, they cannot ID the tusks (why not ?), they cart the tusks to the ivory store for safe keeping where the tusks have been gathering dust for months - mmmm, I see. . . . .
Or maybe they do not report it and then cart it off someplace else

Re: Tuskers of Kruger Discussions & Identification
Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 8:35 am
by 100ponder
But one plus for KNP field staff - they did find and recover Masthulele's tusks.
Not like Isilo's tusks that were apparently lost as a poacher's pick-up.
( Really ? Such an iconic tusker and Tembe field staff did not know his where-abouts – mmmmmm, I see . . . .)