Page 23 of 34

Re: Shangoni Gate & Camps Kruger National Park

Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2017 7:02 pm
by H. erectus
Oh goodness,..

Let me bottom out, smoke a zoll and
set myself aside in greater creative
verse.!!

Do you all know the game of chess?
If not, then take a hike elsewhere!!

If yes, then you will be comfortable
staring at a board of squares, usually
finished along the surround by some
woodwork,..

The squares representing battle ground!!
Black squares and white squares not
necessarily in contempt. Call it the "playing
ground"!!

Two opposing situations, kings queens and all
back row, before both a straight stripe of would
be, ignoramouses, called pions,....

These little idiots get shoved, shunted and sacrificed
at the press of a button!!

Now need I go any further??, or perhaps maybe, maybe
do you regress from having a finger poking your head in
the right direction. There are kings, queens and bishops
and all that other attachment but end of day there will
always be the silly bastard standing there,.. =O: =O:

Call the idiot what you like, fact is there are many O/\

Re: Shangoni Gate & Camps Kruger National Park

Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2017 7:16 pm
by Richprins
Pions are standing up, like you for a while...pion can take king! :yes:

Re: Shangoni Gate & Camps Kruger National Park

Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2017 8:01 pm
by Lisbeth
Pions = pawns ..0..

Re: Shangoni Gate & Camps Kruger National Park

Posted: Sat Apr 08, 2017 12:06 pm
by okie
Yeah , Afrikaans word for pawn ( chess ) --- a common , lowlife , peasant ..........

Re: Shangoni Gate & Camps Kruger National Park

Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2017 5:22 pm
by Richprins
Right!

SP have agreed to a Gauteng meeting regarding Shangoni! Members must please attend, let H.e know? \O




Subject: Invitation to the Shangoni Gate Development Public Meeting at SANParks Pretoria Head Office, Pretoria, Gauteng Province


19 April 2017



Dear Stakeholders (Interested and Affected Parties),



Invitation to the Shangoni Gate Development Public Meeting at SANParks Pretoria Head Office, Pretoria



This email serves to invite you the Interested and Affected Parties of the Shangoni Gate Development to attend the public meeting at SANParks Pretoria Head Office, Pretoria.

Shangoni Gate Public Meeting details:



Date:


09 May 2017

Venue:


643 Leyds Street, Muckleneuk, Pretoria

Time:


14:00pm – 16:00pm



Attached to email, please find the formal invitation letter containing all details and meeting agenda.



Regards,

Thabang Sekele

Vista Place * Suite 1a & 2 * No 52

Cnr Vorster Avenue & Glen Avenue * Glenanda

PO Box 1898 * Sunninghill * 2157

www.envirolution.co.za

thabang@envirolution.co.za

Tel: 0861 44 44 99
Fax: 0861 62 62 22

Re: Shangoni Gate & Camps Kruger National Park

Posted: Wed Apr 19, 2017 6:09 pm
by H. erectus
Richprins wrote: let H.e know?
Appreciate this RP!!..would be great!!!

Re: Shangoni Gate & Camps Kruger National Park

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 6:03 pm
by H. erectus
All written concerns and input toward this endeavor,
in private capacity, will be addressed by the "Practitioner"!'
hopefully so,...!!!

If perhaps any members wish input in the form of verbal
input, please advise!!

Will gladly do so on your behalf!!??

Re: Shangoni Gate & Camps Kruger National Park

Posted: Mon May 08, 2017 6:39 pm
by H. erectus
Big day looming ahead.
Initially under a tree somewhere in Groenkloof,..
Then unto the higher boardwalks, where picturesque
Mafunjane roams, witness like a silent fly on the wall.

The Shangoni gate will be discussed, already mitigated!

Re: Shangoni Gate & Camps Kruger National Park

Posted: Tue May 09, 2017 7:49 pm
by H. erectus
Under the tree did happen,...
We had the pleasure of meeting with Wim Scheepers,
and after some deliberation and clarification it would
seem that some kind of consensus was reached. Although
I question the legal route, still I am the belief that it is
vitally important to have our concerns on record. It is
imperative. However the further I go I have reason to
become more and more disconcerted in the legal system.

After much deliberation and effort it would seem that
Kruger park does not enjoy the privileges of higher legal
protection other than a very basic act, namely NEMA.
(National Environmental Management Act).

The practitioner, Thabang, Envirolutions, managed quite a fine
performance. Still I feel much let down by legislation.

This time round there were Sanparks representatives present.
Namely Blake Schrader and another lady, did not get the name.

The meeting did however produce some pleasant surprises.
Not only the presence of SANparks officials, and the two of them
very accommodating, A new sense of road construction is under
the loupe. The idea is to move away from black tar and replace it
with a more natural look by utilizing other materials and construction
methods.

With regard to Traffic impacts. The practitioner will be conducting a
further in depth study. They realize the shortcoming.

Also according to Mr Schraader he has no budget allocated as yet for
further road upgrading, in fact the "black top" for now only a suggested
implication, and it would seem, should there be need for it, subject to
traffic volumes. That stretch of tar road in excess of 160 to 180 million
Rands in construction costs.

Another surprise and iterated, The PDZ concept. SANPARKS have no
financial obligations outside of it's boundaries. Although the BAR,
Basic Assessment Report seems to cover a lot of activity outside it's
boundaries I was reassured that SANparks Have no jurisdiction at all
in the buffer zone. All activity expressed will within the boundaries!!
Basically a funding scheme has not even been established.

It would seem that all agreed and were positive about the need for this
gate regarding the socio economics and principles that other gates and
local populace enjoy.

It was a good meet, the best so far, yet somehow Kruger can rely on
NEMA for security,..

For now,...

Re: Shangoni Gate & Camps Kruger National Park

Posted: Tue May 09, 2017 7:58 pm
by Richprins
Brilliant work, H.! X#X X#X X#X

And a big thankyou again. :yes:

Blake is quite down to earth, if I remember, but the higher-ups have other agendas, methinks, so feel sorry for the ground-level custodians? :no:

I think litigation is on the table regarding bigger strategy, makes sense?

As said, BARs and EIAs seem to be pushed through at Minister level... O-/

Thanks again, old mate. 0/0