Row after it emerges that Oxford Uni took pro-HUNTING cash for Cecil the lion research
By REBECCA PERRING
PUBLISHED: 11:27, Wed, Aug 5, 2015
THE University of Oxford has come under fire after it emerged that researchers studying slaughtered Cecil the lion were being funded by pro-hunting companies.
The prestigious university's Wildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU) had been tracking much-loved Cecil's movements by satellite since 2008.
And its founder Professor David Macdonald said he was" horrified" after the 13-year-old was brutally killed by American dentist Walter Palmer, after paying £32,000 to hunters, in Zimbabwe last month.
But now it has emerged that the research unit is partially funded by the conservation group Panthera and the Dallas Safari Club, that advocates sustainable trophy hunting.
The news is set to embarrass the unit, which has received a staggering £500,000 in donations from outraged animal lovers since Cecil's death.
The cash is set to go towards funding the unit for another 18 months.
Defending the revelation, Professor Macdonald said there was no conflict of interest between WildCRU's work and its source of funding.
He told The Times: "We simply do our work. There is no risk of any donor affecting our results - we report our results regardless of whether they state any particular point of view or not.
"We are not an advocacy organisation."
Professor Macdonald said it was up to the "wider society" to decide on hunting laws, but WildCRU was simply an "evidence-based organisation".
Mr Palmer allegedly lured Cecil outside a Hwange National Park - in which he was protected - and then wounded him with a bow and arrow, before tracking him for 40 hours, shooting him dead and skinning him.
He is understood to have paid professional hunter Theo Bronkhorst £32,000 to help him track and kill the lion.
Dr Luke Hunter, executive vice president of Panthera, claimed that while "far too many lions are being shot for sport", hunting can "benefit lions".
In a blog this year, he posted: "In Africa, sport hunting is the main revenue earner for huge tracts of wilderness outside national parks and reserves. Many such areas are too remote, undeveloped or disease-ridden for the average tourist, precluding their use for photographic safaris.