Richprins wrote:
Fortunately, Kruger is a National Park, so the actual "Property" cannot be sold to a private entity without a further amendment to the NEMPA...or at the very least a huge rigmarole in Parliament. So Kruger is "safe" in that regard. There is no way significantly sized portions of a National Park can be simply deproclaimed, so we and future generations are assured, at least!
Or are we?
Land Claims.
There is an illuminating thread here:
viewtopic.php?f=317&t=487
One can read there and see that SP has been using Land Claims as a bugbear to justify commercialisation, self-reliance and community involvement since 2008. In reality, only two land claims have been addressed in that period...minor ones regarding Nkambeni and Mjejane in the South of the Park, with no change in the stipulation that relevant land be retained as conservation land, as per the Land Reform stipulations.
So no crisis at all, and Land Reform is handled by its own large and well-funded National Department, nothing to do with SANParks.
But the POLITICAL landscape has changed drastically over the last two years in SA. The ruling party has declined significantly in support, leaving itself massively reliant upon uneducated and social grant-dependent voting communities in rural provinces such as Mpumalanga and Limpopo...many of these communities neighbouring KNP.
Land restitution is the main policy mantra of the ruling party's chief opposition in these two provinces, whereby "colonial" land should be returned to its "rightful owners" for free, for justice to be done and what not. To date productive farmland and enterprises have been targeted remarkably selectively.
Over the years, SP has rather unusually been upping the community involvement of its programs, culminating in "sustainable conservation" being the absolute predominating policy in its latest 2015 mission statement. New head of SP board and CEO of KNP are also commercialisation experts. This is no coincidence.
Next year we have local municipal elections, and the governing party is becoming increasingly desperate amid various scandals and collapses regarding parastatals. They are also renowned for making fantastic promises come election time, especially placating and awarding tribal chiefs and kings, who do actually instruct their followers on how to vote, a fact!
A scenario:
While SP and by implication SA government have Southern Kruger, the massive money generator, under control with relatively satisfied and placated neighbouring communities (Numbi, Matsulu and Nkhuhlu), the huge communities neighbouring the Central and Northern districts, like Thulamahashe, Acornhoek, Bushbuckridge, Thekamahahle, Namakgale (Phalaborwa), Giyani, Thulamela etc. have received little compensation.
The lower-intensity Central and Northern Regions are a drop in the ocean as far as tourism revenue is concerned. While there are a number of Luxury Lodges there, that rental income will relatively soon dry up as their leases run out...so expendable as election crisis is paramount next year.
Extremely simple to promise local chiefs swathes of land in Kruger in those regions, literally ownership, not costing anyone any money, as the government fiscus is empty, in exchange for votes. Regarding Parliamentary majority approval for this...well, it could be done easily once the ruling party has those secured votes. Even if that does not happen, the chiefs will have their land. And Government will have lost little of the financial income.
And meanwhile tenders and contracts will have been sorted regarding OSV-only tourist access to the lucrative South of the Park, self-drive abolished, Hotels built on the perimiters in the PDZ just outside Kruger but feeding SP, Skukuza Airport operating at full blast, etc.
Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596