Riverbed cycle challenge in Kgalagadi

[Moshi Monster]

Toko an EA and public participation process was required for the Nossob Eco Trail that has no construction in the camps beside a few poles with nets around for a shower and long drop. A media release was done and a trial run before the EA was completed.

The cycle challenge is maybe not a weekly event but the number of particpants far out weigh the Nossob trial that only allows a max of 20 people and 6 vehicles.

The link to the media release is below. If something similar was done for this challenge and a media release can be found on SANParks website dated back July 2011 when the trial run was done I will feel much better and know there will be a fair chance to object, but now you just hear about the event.

http://www.sanparks.org/about/media/200 ... otrail.pdf

Media Release - 11 December 2000
Project Brief - Proposed Nossob Motorised (4x4) Eco-trail - Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park - South Africa

The SANP (South African National Parks) are investigating the introduction of a 4x4 (motorised) eco-trail in the South African section of the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park. This proposed trail provisionally to be known as the
Nossob 4x4 (Motorised) Eco-Trail, is approximately 200 km in length and can only be undertaken in an appropriate 4x4 vehicle. It should be noted at the outset that the purpose of this trail is to provide an "eco-experience" of the
Kalahari and is not a 4X 4 route for the purposes of putting ones vehicle to the "test".

The SANP are bound by various environmental legislation including NEMA (National Environmental Management Act) the EIA Regulations (R1182/3 - the Environment Conservation Act) as well as the principles of IEM (Integrated Environmental Management). The proposed activity is a listed activity in terms of the aforementioned regulations and will only be permitted pending the positive outcome of an Environmental Assessment (EA). The National Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (NDEA&T) have issued a directive that the SANP can run the eco-trail on a "trial" basis only for a period of a year as part of the Environmental Assessment. During this period the PPP (Public Participation Process) of the EA will also be conducted and the trail closely monitored.

The proposed route traverses the dune-veiled on average approximately 5 to 8 km west of the Nossob River and is orientated in a sub-parallel direction to this river (i.e. NNW-SSE orientation - refer to the attached plan) from a distance of approximately 40 km from Twee Rivieren to a point approximately 65 km NNW of the Nossob Rest Camp. Access points to the trail are from the tourist road between Twee Rivieren and Unions End.

During the trial period it is intended to run one completely self catering trail per week (per 7 day period), comprising a minimum of 2 vehicles (excluding the Trail Leader’s vehicle) and a maximum of 6 vehicles / 20 persons (inclusive
of the Trail Leader's vehicle). It is recommended that trailists endeavour to book as a single group, failing which single bookings will be considered, pending the minimum number stipulation of 2 vehicles. Four temporary overnight sites have been located consisting of a rustic toilet (long drop) and shower facilities. It is intended to run a 2 and a 3-night trail (utilising 2 or 3 of the 4 temporary overnight sites) on an alternate basis. The trail will depart on any given day of the week on a first come first serve booking basis. Trails will end at approximately midday at the Nossob Restcamp.

No trailers / caravans will be permissible and all equipment and provisions (including fuel, water and firewood) must be carried within or on the vehicle. Restrictions in respect of types of vehicle (based on axle length and ground clearance) will apply; details of which may be obtained from the Trail Manager as designated below. Prospective participants will be required to sign an indemnity form and a strict code of driving will be enforced during the trail. All participants will be required to complete a questionnaire in terms of the PPP (Public Participation Process) of the Environmental Investigation.

Some other information of note in respect to this trail includes the following:
• Water - Much of the water in the region is brackish and hence drinking water should be self catered. Those participants wishing to utilise shower facilities should supply their own water. An amount of 10 lt. / person / day is recommended.
•Fuel - All fuel (petrol / diesel / gas / firewood) must be self catered and is available at Twee Rivieren / Nossob. The collection of wood within the National Park is prohibited.
•Cost - the cost of the trail is R400 / vehicle / night, irrespective of the number of occupants + entrance fees to the park, presently at R36/adult and R18/ child.
•Bookings - these may be done at the Reception Office, Twee Rivieren at telephone number (054) 561-2014 or fax number (054) 561-2005.
•Trails are envisaged to commence towards the end of January 2001

For further details pertaining to the Nossob Motorised (4x4) Eco-Trail contact:
Mr Martin Engelbrecht (Trail Manager) at telephone number (054) 561-2006, fax (054) 561-2005, E-mail martine@parks-sa.co.za during office hours only.
OR
Mr Nardus du Plessis at telephone number (054) 561-2010, fax (054) 561-2005 during office hours only.
NOTE: As indicated this Eco-Trail is in the EA (Environmental Assessment) phase and all those wishing to register as an I&AP (Interested and Affected Party) in this process should contact:

Dr Hugo Bezuidenhout (Environmental Co-ordinator)
Tel: (053) 832-5488
Fax: (053) 833-4543
E- mail: hbez@kimnet.co.za
Or
Mr Murray Macgregor
(Head: Environmental Services, SANP)
Tel: (012) 426-5209
Fax: (012) 343-2723/2832

All queries concerning the EA Process should be directed to the same. It must also be noted that as this activity is in a trial period it may be subject to change/s at short notice.

[Toko]

There is a reviewed SANParks regulation to permit commercial activities by 01 October 2012 (for Western Cape Parks only???).
Re: Table Mountain NP Commercial Operator Permits
Amongst other activities it includes: Group events, concerts, races, competitions, cultural or sporting events, organized or special events, fund raising


COMMERCIAL OPERATOR PERMITS PROCEDURES & GUIDELINES


Here a quote of an interesting piece about environmental impact (for commercial activities though)

3 ASSESSMENTS OF APPLICATIONS

3.1 Minimal impact activities
Assessment of a proposed commercial activity against the principal assessment criteria which is measured against the Conservation Development Framework (CDF) or zoning plans which are park specific, is not required where the Park Management considers that the commercial activity will have minimal impact on
biodiversity, enjoyment or use of the national park.
Activities with minimal impact may include those with all of the following characteristics:
o non-manipulative (i.e. no physical disturbance caused to the organisms or their habitat) and
o do not include the use of structures and
o do not exclude or significantly restrict access by other users of the national park.Where a proposed activity is determined to have minimal environmental or social impacts, a brief statement of findings justifying the determination will be recorded by SANParks.
Conditions may be placed on a permit to ensure the activity has minimal impact.

3.2 Activities with greater than minimal impacts
The Park Management must have regard to the principal assessment criteria when determining whether to grant consent to an activity with a greater than minimal impact on biodiversity, enjoyment or use of the national park. The Park Management must also consider any other relevant matters.

3.3 Other requirements
The principal assessment criteria include any other requirements that the Park Management consider appropriate to the proposed commercial activity.
This will depend on the nature of the proposed commercial activity and the zone(s) in which the commercial activity is intended. Other requirements may include, amongst other matters, the following:
o whether the commercial activity could be conducted outside the national park
o application of the "precautionary principle" where the potential impacts of a proposed commercial activity are unknown
o the likely magnitude and duration of any effects of the proposed commercial activity on existing uses
o the likely effects of the proposed commercial activity on adjoining and adjacent areas
o whether proposed research activities have been endorsed by the National ParksResearch Committee and have received appropriate research ethics clearance.

3.4 Consent must be refused
Consent must be refused for a commercial activity if:
o the activity is inconsistent with the objectives of the Act and SANParks' policies
o the activity is inconsistent with the objectives of a zone
o the activity is inconsistent with a restriction on the number of permits that may be issued in relation to a national park or zone.

[PRWIN]

Thanks Toko

The way I see it they breaking all of 3.1

[Toko]

Gabrielle Venter, Manager Media and Stakeholder Relations on SPF

SANParks think, an EIA is not necessary, because the event is without building of permanent structures and uses only exiting roads, animal tracks and mobile campig will be on existing disturbed sites.
But they will do an EMP to manage the impacts and will monitor the event .

[Richprins]

Shouldn't more study be done BEFORE the event, rather than rubber stamping it afterwards? Are independent people going to do the monitoring?

[Toko]

RP, monitoring and reporting is to be done by an Environmental Control Officer and this should be a person acting as an independent controlling and monitoring agent regarding all environmental concerns and associated environmental impacts (afterwards ).

[annie]

I suppose we can be grateful it's 50 cyclists over 2 days (for now) and not 100 quad-bikes over 3-4 days (for now)!

But seriously, I still can't see why they can’t have the cycling along the road instead of on the virgin riverbed. If SANParks was prepared to move the event from March to September when they became aware of the EWT’s concerns about nesting birds of prey, why wouldn’t they consider moving the actual track to an area that is already degraded – i.e. the road? Do they feel it’s too late for them to change this? Honestly, I wouldn’t see this as ‘losing face’ or ‘backing down’, but taking negative sentiment and environmental issues into consideration in a responsible way.

Let me reiterate, though: I think the development issues (new camps despite overburdening roads, water resources, etc) are even more important, with the cycle event furore just giving a hint of trends to come. I'd really like to try to harness the passion surrounding the cycle event to give the other developments a wider airing.

Please revisit these threads and make your voices heard
SP forum on KTP developments http://www.sanparks.org/forums/viewtopi ... 73&t=59527

Africa Wild forum on KTP developments viewtopic.php?f=78&t=456

[Flutterby]

[Peter Betts]

Annie Road/Riverbed is STILL NOT RIGHT PERIOD...they must have it on table MT or something but NOT in Kalagadi

[annie]

Annie Road/Riverbed is STILL NOT RIGHT PERIOD...they must have it on table MT or something but NOT in Kalagadi

I agree with you, Peter. I'm just trying to be reasonable in a worst-case scenario...