New EIA Malelane Lodge

[Flutterby]

[H. erectus]

And then it just popped up, Thanks Rog,...

Mmmhhh,...so often suggested, "do your thing
outside of the boundaries", would be more socio
supportive!!!

[H. erectus]

Hopefully just this will be the end of a long drawn out
political agenda!! .Gov, c/o Sanparks, may feel they stand
proud on what they have to offer, for they have the gift at
hand,...Gooombye Wright and Rezidor!!! It was foolish from
the outset,..!!! Go Well!!

[H. erectus]

To view the above pdf in the right way up position,
open the page by left click then double right click
the image a menu will open asking "rotate clockwise,.

Do this twice,...

Sorry about this, not my pdf.

[nan]

no problem

[H. erectus]

Thanks Nan,..not that the contents is of concern,

Fact is, the Secprop, Malelane Safari tented Lodge
has competition!! It was suggested for them to look
at this angle of approach!!

Subsequently Secprop's second term for providing
detail toward development if not, almost relapsed!!!

One year down the line!! Four to go,.. >.Gov anticipating!!

[H. erectus]

There is quite obviously something bothering the
developer in his accomplishments.,...

[H. erectus]

My reply at the governing body of the National Parks,








With all due respect,

Mr. Wrights communication received and read!! However it would seem there
Be a shortfall in deliverance as suggested by the .gov, hence further concerns!!
The applicant circumventing certain set proposals in the application approved as
By government, amended once over!!! I herewith wish to be informed how many
Years the applicant has at his disposal in order to bring this project to fruition, without
.gov inference, hoping for a better day!~!

I wish to receive from the DEA, agreement that should any further ambitious undertaking,
Be subject to additional Environmental Impact Assessment study, in order to mitigate!!!~
The applicant now wanders on other soil, never trodden!! Or so he believes, and Sanparks,
In alleviating traffic concerns. “By shifting the goal posts” does not necessarily mean lesser
Spectator value!!!

Thank you Heloise’
I trust that you will keep me informed!!

Fred de Groot
AW

[RogerFraser]

not too good with all the legal double speak but surely if they change the road vs what was suggested in the original proposal then they should actually start the whole process again as it changes the proposed development impact substantially

[Richprins]

The most recent discussions with SANParks identified the preferred solution of an alternate new private access road leading off the H-3, a few kilometres further north of the S114 junction, which will then link to the proposed rerouted path of the S114, planned to circumvent the lodge above the Timfenheni junction. This solution is in preference to the originally proposed upgrade and use of the current public S114 road, a portion of which passes within direct view of Leopard Creek, and a route that can be a popular public use road during the peak seasons. The proposition outlined above, will go a long way to alleviating traffic congestion concerns, and will mitigate most of the impacts previously foreseen. An assessment first needs to be undertaken and solution agreed to between MSRI and SANParks. Until this matter is resolved with SANParks, we are unable to undertake a meaningful TIA, as the scope of works is still undetermined. We are endeavouring to resolve this outstanding matter with SANParks as soon as possible, and will notify you as soon as a solution is determined. The next steps will then be communicated to the DEA. In the interim, no construction activities have been or are being undertaken on site.

This is just a smokescreen to justify cash strapped delays.

Enough now, leave it! No new roads too now, FFS!