Saving rhinos

Information & discussion on the Rhino Poaching Pandemic
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67563
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Saving rhinos

Post by Lisbeth »

The world’s last rhinos are in bad trouble – here’s why

By Helena Kriel and Don Pinnock• 20 March 2021

Image
White rhino Adult Pencil drawings:https://matthewbellart.co.za

Saving rhinos Part 1: The crisis. As anti-poaching costs soar, protecting rhinos has become a costly liability. Debates on what to do about it have become a war zone, and the biggest losers are the rhinos themselves.

In the Kruger National Park, the heartland of state-owned rhinos, numbers have dropped by about 63% over 10 years, despite anti-poaching expenditure in the hundreds of millions of rand.

Private owners now own more than half of the rhinos in South Africa, but have had to ramp up their already expensive security costs to counter increased levels of poaching.

So, for many private owners, rhinos have become too costly and too stressful to keep and they could end up ditching them.

Caught between a rock and a hard place, rhinos have become a liability, their horns an Asian commodity. This could spell the beginning of the end for this ancient species in the wild.

Anticipating trouble?

“Baby coming in! Mother poached. Manyeleti Reserve.”

Sanctuary staff scramble like a fighter squadron. Manyeleti is a killing field. Rhinos there know they’re in the danger zone. They scan, anticipating trouble, jumpy, ears twitching, standing rump to rump because, invariably, there will be trouble. And when the moon is full, it comes.

The helicopter crests the hills, a steel dragonfly, coming closer. Dust swallows it whole as it lands. The doors open, the vet jumps out.

Through an opening a very small pink creature is visible. His eyes are blindfolded, his ears stopped up. He’s sedated and lies so still he could be dead, his hide baggy with his umbilical cord still attached.

The team’s ready. The baby is tilted into a blanket and they run with him. There’s a panga wound on his head. He’s fallen from warm amniotic fluid into this.

“We have to hope no blindness,” says the vet, “or brain injury.”

This is Manji and his journey has just begun.

These are the people saving young rhinos, one at a time, at great effort. After every poacher’s full moon the babies come, traumatised, victims of demand for horn that has become a commodity in Asia.

We watch a secret video tape of poachers being interviewed. They stare into the camera, balaclavas keeping their identities secret. They’re dressed in swanky designer gear and leather jackets. One sports a Rolex, another holds two iPhones: one for personal, the other for poaching updates. They let the filmmaker know they will poach the Kruger till there’s no longer a rhino left standing.

Until fairly recently, poaching used to be about survival. Now poachers have large houses and expensive cars. To impoverished communities they’re rock stars, and youngsters want to be like them. And they train, teenagers, beginning with a duiker and ending with a rhino.

For the team of three on the video it’s a poacher’s moon. They’ve burned a hyena’s tail for protection and walk quietly through the night’s silver light. They tread in single file, wearing shoes with soles sewn on backwards to fool the guards. Suddenly they stop. Ahead is a mother rhino followed by her young calf.

One of the team takes aim and shoots the cow through the heart using a high-powered modern weapon. The night explodes. The rhino staggers, falling forwards, keening, screaming. The calf runs back and forth.

The team closes in, hacking. They slash at the calf to get it out of the way. The mother’s horns come away with a rip of blood and mucous while she’s still alive.

The horn is zipped into a backpack and they run. The injured calf inches closer, then stands in confusion by its mother’s side, face slashed and bleeding.

Stomach-turning images show us what that looks like. On social media you find videos of poached mother rhinos lying on their backs, butchered, swollen udders ready to give sustenance. Their young calves stand alongside in terror and confusion.

But these images can’t impart the sentience of the animal – and the love: what else can you call it? Rhinos walk together and eat side by side. They sleep with their bodies touching. A mother rhino keeps her baby beside her for three years.

An orphaned baby rhino will suffer severe trauma after watching its mother being killed. It will need medication to keep it from stress-induced ulcers. Rhinos in rehabilitation turn the corner only when they find a new rhino to connect with. Connection for the rhino is everything. Is that anything different from how we humans feel?

Poaching hit Africa’s rhinos from 2005, but there are two opposing narratives about why that happened. Conservation NGOs say it was kicked off by Vietnamese criminal syndicates exploiting loopholes in South African legislation and their subsequent stimulation of demand for rhino horn in China and Vietnam. Private rhino owners insist it’s because South Africa banned domestic sales in 2007.

Either way, with millionaires in Vietnam growing by 150% in the last five years, rhino horn as a status symbol means guaranteed income for Asian criminal syndicates and poachers, with an estimated 10 to 15 teams working the Kruger Park daily. Called “grey gold”, rhino horn is now more expensive than heroin on the black market.

Rhinos in private hands are relatively safe for now. They are TB-free, they have DNA certification and less than 5% of poaching takes place there. At great cost, poaching numbers there are low. But as rhinos dwindle in Kruger, Botswana is increasingly being hit. When that supply runs out, poachers will set their sights on the last stocks available –the game reserves of private rhino owners.

Counting rhinos

In their various body forms, rhinos have been around for 55 million years. Some stood as high as a house and saw off giant hyenas and crocs half the length of soccer fields. With a thick hide and weaponised noses, adults defended their young like a military squad with fixed bayonets. Then we came along.

There are now only five species left and they’re hanging on by their toenails. Northern white rhino? Two females left, so they’re gone as a species. Sumatran rhinos? About 80 in Sumatra and Borneo. Then there are 80 Javans on the western tip of the island, where a tsunami could wipe them out. This leaves the southern white and black rhinos.

According to most authorities, there are now fewer than 20,000 rhinos left on Earth, down 2,000 from three years ago. If they were human that would be equivalent to a small town. South Africa is home to about 80% of them.

According to SANParks’ head of conservation services, Dr Luthando Dziba, by its 2019 count there were 3,549 white rhino and 268 black rhinos in Kruger Park, but the latest count is still being collated. Taking 2020 poaching figures into account, the numbers will be lower. Because Kruger had not posted numbers for some years, disclosing the drop from 10,700 in 2010 sent shockwaves through the environmental community. Deaths were exceeding births and the only way that story goes is down.

In Botswana, once a safe haven, it’s even worse. The Okavango Delta may have fewer than 20 rhinos, down from several hundred a few years ago.

Across all state and provincial parks in South Africa, there are an estimated 6,100 rhinos. According to the Private Rhino Owners Association, an additional 8,100 (60%) are in private facilities – about 2,500 on intensive farms, the rest in private game reserves of various sizes. At one end are large commercial farming operations. At the other are private tourism reserves who see rhinos as an essential component of their Big Five holding, or owners who just like having rhinos on their property.

The greatest number of rhinos in the world are now in private hands. We need to take a hard look at why they have them and what they plan to do with them.

Counting the costs

In South Africa, most poaching is in national parks and provincial reserves, and anti-poaching costs there have gone through the roof. From 2010 to 2020 the budget jumped from R74-million to R207-million, paid for by grants and tax revenues. But the huge investment into solving the problem has not brought down poaching, though incidents have declined because there are fewer rhinos to poach.

Kruger Park was always seen as a rhino heartland, but its geographical position between impoverished populations has made it the epicentre of poaching. Rangers within the park have also been arrested and charged with poaching. It’s clear the park will need a considerable shake-up and an urgent rethink. As a rhino sanctuary, Kruger must not fail. It would be a conservation and public relations disaster.

Image
Adult and young black rhino. Pencil drawings: https://matthewbellart.co.za

Private ownership took off in the early 1950s when Ian Player, then warden in the iMfolozi Game Reserve, pioneered methods and drugs to immobilise rhinos for translocation in order to disperse gene pools to different countries and venues. At the time there were only about 400 white rhinos in South Africa and their future as a species was uncertain.

Player launched Operation Rhino, with animals being moved around the world – an effort credited with saving the southern white rhino from extinction.

White rhino numbers over the following decades escalated to about 20,000, with large numbers in private hands. The private game reserves cared for and protected their crashes of rhinos at their own expense because of their Big Five tourism value, and the numbers grew. They were seen as conservation heroes.

But that was before the poaching tsunami hit. Anti-poaching costs have now become exorbitant. State parks are heavily subsidised by the government, some with NGO and international funder support. But private game reserves have to pay their own way through tourism, grants or from personal wealth. There’s no subsidy system deduction.

These owners now require costly Intensive Protection Zones (IPZs), 24-hour guards, trained anti-poaching dogs, mounted patrols and drones. Rhino speculators and farmers such as John Hume each have about 1,800 rhinos, but the average private rhino owner, according to

Tertia Jooste of Rhino Connect, an organisation working with private rhino owners, has maybe between two and 20 rhinos. The cost of protecting a small family crash of up to 10 rhinos is between R30,000 to R40,000 a month. Until now it’s been working.

For owners there are four potential sources of income from rhinos: tourism, trophy hunting, selling the animals or selling their horns. All but hunting are presently roadblocked until tourist occupancies start to pick up again. And there’s a growing public opinion against trophy hunting internationally.

According to Pelham Jones of the Private Rhino Owners Association (PROA), rhino prices have dropped from an average of half a million rand to around R100,000 an animal. Added to this, Covid-19 lockdowns and international travel bans have taken their toll on tourism, further reducing income streams, putting some private rhino owners in deep trouble.

There’s another roadblock. Led by large commercial rhino farmers, many owners hitched their wagon to the one-trick pony of selling horn on the international market, which was banned in 1977 by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (Cites). Given increasing sensitivity to animal welfare and unclear trade economics in Convention meetings and a growing NGO lobby, that’s not likely to change any time soon.

According to Dr Adam Cruise, who has written extensively on the organisation in National Geographic and elsewhere, “given current moves on biodiversity and strengthening the restrictions on their own ivory market, the European Union is unlikely to back a lifting of restrictions. And neither China nor the US seems to have an appetite to open this issue.”

So hoping to fund rhino security and conservation through the sale of horns on the international market any time soon is simply magical thinking. But as costs rise and incomes dwindle, the Private Rhino Owners Association (PROA) and economists like Michael ’t Sas-Rolfes disagree.

There’s no doubt that as anti-poaching costs soar, owners with smaller numbers of rhinos are the ones hurting the most. Although the issue of selling horns had probably not been on their minds in the beginning, as the situation worsened horns in their vaults began looking like gold they cannot spend. To them, bans make no sense.

“In a perfect world, animals would be free,” says Johan Odendaal, MD of a privately owned Big Five game reserve in South Africa. “This isn’t a perfect world. Anyone who is against the rhino as a commodity is driving the species to extinction. The guy who wants to run a small farm cannot afford rhinos now. We are losing those guys.

“They say: ‘Take my rhinos, it’s too expensive to look after them.’ And then what do they do? Sell the farms? Get rid of the rhinos? Who will take them? I haven’t seen a rhino on auction for 18 months. There’s no longer a market for a living rhino. If wildlife doesn’t have a value, you will get rid of it. And they’ll go back to cattle farming.”

Carmela D’Arrigo, a small private rhino owner, struggles every month to meet her costs. She owns rhinos, she says, for the love of the animal.

“We have a close relationship with them. They all have names. They roam free in this place, which is 5,000 hectares. It costs upwards of R30,000 a month to protect them. With the threat of poaching, my phone is next to me constantly. It takes over your life.

“We struggle so much financially. We have to dehorn our rhinos for security, so we have horn sitting in vaults. Money for a horn would pay for their protection. But I wouldn’t even know where to start. And I’ve never believed in selling it.”

“If private rhino owners run out of money, what will they do?” asks wildlife vet Dr Johan Marais, founder of Saving the Survivors. “If John Hume, the biggest private rhino owner, decides tomorrow this is all too expensive and says ‘Here are my rhinos, you take them’, what then? Who will look after them? I don’t care if they’re like cows. We still have rhinos!” Hume claims he is on the verge of bankruptcy.

How does Marais feel about some of the rhino farmers being in it for the money? “If they’re protecting my heritage and I can see rhinos in 10 years’ time, I don’t care. I’ve always said: the future of conservation lies in private hands. They have massive costs, but they get it right. My question is simply this: Are there rhinos on your property? Are they breeding? If yes, support them.”

The aggressive drive to legalise horn sales, however, has put private owners on a collision course with global environmentalists, conservation NGOs and wildlife economists like the late Alejandro Nadel. According to the wildlife trade monitoring organisation Traffic: “Legal supply may legitimise or encourage rhino horn use and increase demand.”

Economist and former rhino-owner Colin Bell says selling horn doesn’t add up to a survival plan for rhinos, only for rhino farmers.

“Firstly, a legal trade in horn would stimulate demand and increase poaching, because poaching is cheaper than rearing a rhino. And, secondly, even if we dehorned all private rhinos and sold all stockpiles, demand would soon outstrip supply and lead to further poaching.

“Most of those rhinos are in private game reserves where viewing rhinos with horns is cherished by tourists. That leaves probably only 2,500 individual rhinos on farms that can be rounded up and anaesthetised every second year to have their horns shaved.

“At its peak in the 1970s and 1980s, poaching was supplying Asia between 45 and 70 tonnes of horn a year. We could never sustainably supply that level of demand legally from stocks, shavings and mortalities. Poaching won’t stop if we go the route of attempting to flood the market.”

So here’s the situation as it stands: The demand for rhino horn in Asia is almost limitless and possibly rising with increasing wealth in countries such as Vietnam and China.

Poaching syndicates are highly professional and have the power to manipulate the market and pay poachers.

State parks are unable to stem the poaching despite huge costs and, in some cases, because of internal corruption.

Private rhino owners can no longer sell rhinos at high prices because of the costs of protecting them, and the possibility of persuading Cites to open up international trade is remote. Some are on the brink of financial collapse.

Trade bans like those in 1993 for rhino horn and 1989 for ivory have worked in the past and can work again, as long as demand is not stimulated. Yet, as things stand, despite innovative demand-reduction campaigns by NGOs in Asia, poaching is not going down – largely because of the mixed messaging coming from diverse African stakeholders, the sophistication of syndicates and horn’s status symbol in destination countries.

Because of a fierce standoff between intensely anti-trade rhino range states, NGOs and pro-trade rhino farmers – the people who in coalition could best formulate a survival plan for rhinos – there’s no forward movement.

What is to be done? It’s crisis time for rhinos. Will they go extinct on our watch? Or is there a workable solution, a way forward?

And what of Manji, the day-old calf who arrived with umbilical cord and machete cuts gouged into his head? Rhinos weep, and during his first few weeks in the sanctuary he cried, unable to eat, listless and traumatised. In his loneliness, he befriended a tractor tyre. It took human love and 24/7 care to coax him through.

Now he’s a full-grown bull in a stronghold and flanked by the cows in his crash. He might not be in the savannah, but he’s within an electrified perimeter fence and is safe.

Yet every full moon his sanctuary gets the call: “Baby coming in!” and the staff leap into action.

Another traumatised baby rhino, a mother lying in the bush, face ripped apart. And in Asia someone is being gifted a piece of rhino horn as a show of status. Can they begin to know the suffering of that small offering? DM168


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67563
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Saving rhinos Part 1

Post by Lisbeth »

:-( :-( :-(


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 76089
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: Saving rhinos Part 1

Post by Richprins »

Legalise trade!!! 0:


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67563
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Saving rhinos Part 1

Post by Lisbeth »

It's the only option left! I am still not sure that it is the right way, but if we don't try.......... O**


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Alf
Posts: 11606
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2014 12:40 pm
Country: south africa
Location: centurion
Contact:

Re: Saving rhinos Part 1

Post by Alf »

I don’t think there’s anyway out anymore O/

The people trying to save them are only a handful and with costs increasing to protect them these people will also give up

So goodbye to the rhinos :-(


Next trip to the bush??

Let me think......................
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67563
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Saving rhinos

Post by Lisbeth »

The future of rhinos: What it will take to save an endangered ancient species

By Don Pinnock and Helena Kriel• 19 May 2021

Image
(Photo: Helena Kriel)

Daily Maverick 168 organised a discussion with stakeholders about the future of rhinos. Taking the debate about legal sales of rhino horn off the table helped to bring different viewpoints together.

In a meeting of rhino owners, wildlife vets, conservation NGOs, eco-economists, security experts and SANParks organised by Daily Maverick 168, the outline of a conservation framework began to emerge to offset the alarming decline in the number of wild rhinos in South Africa, where most live.

Key to this would be patrolled strongholds within and outside national parks until poaching can be brought under control. We also need a new global narrative that sees all rhinos as an international herd and a biodiversity treasure. And every rhino keeper, state or private, should be regarded as their custodians.

In a previous article we outlined the problems and bitter polarities in the rhino debate. Asking for a relaxation of entrenched positions with a view to solutions, we called together a wide range of people with specialist knowledge.

Everyone who participated in the crisis Zoom meeting, facilitated by the Wilderness Foundation Africa, was keenly aware that the hands of the rhino clock are perilously close to midnight. When we took trade in rhino horn off the table, they found surprising common ground in their concerns and a need for collaboration.

Participants underlined the importance of acknowledging that there are many types of custodianship: state/public, private conservation and commercially farmed. There are also foreign owners and mines with rhinos on their land. All of these need to work together to conserve rhinos. This should also be the mandate of rhino conservation NGOs.

“There’s a problem of saying government has custodianship of rhinos and private owners have ownership,” said Peter Straughan, who manages an eco-lodge and a small crash of rhinos. “It causes real problems in public perception. We need to change the narrative. We’re all custodians. If we look at it this way, it could start to break down present polarities.”

Private rhino ownership began as a way to expand the protected area base for conservation. In the 1950s there were fewer than 500 white rhinos in South Africa. Most were placed in Kruger Park because it had the habitat and range. Then poaching ratcheted up, causing the decimation of rhinos in the park.

Thanks to the visionary work of Dr Ian Player, the population grew to tens of thousands. Then, in 2007, industrial-scale rhino poaching took off.

At that time, South Africans came together passionately to combat the growing scourge. With NGOs dedicated to ending the crisis, donations poured in. People had plastic rhino horns attached to the grills of their cars. They wore beaded rhino bracelets and sported Save the Rhino car stickers. There was a feeling that we would prevail.

Today, however, compassion fatigue has set in. This has been compounded by the impact of Covid-19 on lost livelihoods and uncertainty about the future. With serious poverty and suffering, how does one add rhinos to the equation?

We now have a situation where most of the country’s – and therefore the world’s – rhinos are in private hands. But as poaching on state lands sees rhino numbers plummeting, private owners facing a poaching onslaught can no longer afford to protect them and many are looking to disinvest in rhinos.

The meeting was to see if there was a way forward, and the consensus was that there is a way if we have the commitment. Here’s a possible scenario stitched together from the ideas put forward by the participants.

Image
Original pencil drawing. (https://matthewbellart.co.za)

Jump forward in time to 2035. South Africa basks in global acclaim for successfully implementing a strategy that yet again pulled the rhino from the brink of extinction. Rhinos are regarded as essential eco-warriors, highly prized powerhouses that manage grasslands, prevent fires by close cropping (they create “grazing lawns”) and cultivate carbon sinks, helping to reduce carbon emissions in a world fighting climate change.

In a scenario we can envisage, global financial agencies issue bonds that protect all rhinos. International corporations pay fees for carbon credits for every adult rhino as a carbon-sequestering, keystone species.

Merchants in the legal international exotic animal trade agree to pay a tax that offsets the high cost of security for South Africa’s rhinos, while also funding highly targeted, global anti-poaching and demand-reduction marketing campaigns.

But back to the present: how do we get from here to there?

To enable open discussion, the contentious debate surrounding the sale of rhino horn had to be held in abeyance. For the purposes of the group’s discussion and this article, it was agreed that it be taken off the table. Here’s why.

Many conservation NGOs are anti-trade, convinced that legalised horn sale would fuel increased demand and doom the remaining rhinos. But private and public rhino custodians hold stockpiles of horn cut over the years to deter poaching – a veritable goldmine that private rhino owners hope could defray monumental security costs. Between these two poles is a clash of paradigms.

The sale of rhino horn was banned on the international market in 1977 by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (Cites) and that’s not likely to change any time soon. But constant lobbying by commercial rhino operations has been a stumbling block in meaningful action to save the species.

Participants in the discussion held unshakable views regarding horn sale. To agree to silence that debate was a major concession on their part. On a range of other topics there was remarkable and – for many participants – surprising accord. These are some of the conclusions.

The status quo spells doom for rhinos. Kruger alone allocates R200-million a year to its anti-poaching budget, yet currently loses 200 rhinos a year. This means each animal is a million rand lost.

This is unsustainable.

All rhino species must be regarded as an international herd that needs protection for the Earth’s biodiversity and not merely as state or private animals.

The language of the debate must change from antagonism to collaboration. There was agreement that the immediate future of rhinos hinges on public and private custodians, NGOs, scientists and environmentalists working together.

Poaching is at critical levels and the acting CEO of SANParks, Dr Luthando Dziba, acknowledged that Kruger Park needed help to deal with it.

“Our Rhino numbers have been in decline and that trend continues unabated,” he said. “We have relentless poaching despite all of the financial resources we’re putting into it. A problem is that we’re losing rhino cows to poaching, which has an impact on future generations.

“We usually lose the young calf with the cow and possibly an unborn calf if the cow’s pregnant. It’s eating into the total rhino population.

“Our investments are not returning the kind of reduction in poaching that we’d like. We’re reaching levels where we need to find alternatives that are safe but viable in terms of the size of land for growing a healthy population outside Kruger.

“We’re very open to open discussions on drastic interventions that could help us to ensure a protected population both within and outside our parks.”

In the protection of wildlife, local communities are key stakeholders. “We’re looking how to integrate local communities into rhino conservation so they have a stake in a living rhino rather than a poached one,” said Dziba. “We need to arrive at a position where if a person touches a rhino it becomes a community matter. Innocent people in communities are being corrupted by organised criminals. We have to break that link.”

Gabriel Fava of Born Free noted that mobilising the resources needed to protect and conserve rhinos will come down to recognising the true value they make to the ecosystems on which we all ultimately rely. “Any benefits arising from that recognition must be equitably shared with local communities if we are to disincentivise poaching and promote wildlife guardianship by those living closest to rhino populations.”

Image
Original pencil drawing. (https://matthewbellart.co.za)

Strongholds were a central theme of the discussion. Until poaching can be brought under control, all rhinos need to be gathered within well-protected areas on state and private land. This will require state, bequest, private, international conservation tax and international donor funds. Private custodians who keep rhinos for conservation need support and tax relief.

“It’s time for the private guys to stand together with the government and say we need to do something, set some rules and try and prevent poaching,” said Marius Kotze who owns a private game reserve with rhinos. “Guys are just leaving their rhinos unprotected now.”

Bruce “Doc” Watson, co-founder of Dimension Data and Connected Conservation, agreed: “Government or the state has to work together with the private landowners. And without their support there, we’re not going to succeed in saving rhinos.”

Until the present poaching tsunami abates, all strongholds need to be fortified by fences, high-tech security, motion sensors, drones, gunshot detectors, dogs, guards on horseback and armed foot soldiers.

“We need to make safe havens a priority,” said Andrew Muir of the Wilderness Foundation Africa. Johan Marais of Saving the Survivors agreed: “Growing numbers of secret strongholds are popping up throughout South Africa and protected areas in East Africa, including Kenya and Tanzania,” he said. “They show remarkable success in protecting their rhino. You have a smaller area with a higher number of animals that can be better protected, whether within a national park or outside it.”

Dziba said it would be easy to set aside 10,000 to 15,000 hectares within the Kruger National Park that could be intensely protected.

“If we establish a stronghold within Kruger,” he said, “we’re going to need resources and collaboration from private sector partners to ensure that we have zero poaching within that area.”

Ethno-biologist Helen Lunn cautioned, however, that “we need to acknowledge that strongholds are a language of retreat. They’re a reaction to the poachers, not an answer for rhinos.” But in the midst of a crisis they’re an essential stopgap.

A Kruger stronghold would not be without its problems as a safe haven for rhinos, Dziba noted, and acknowledged that there are “internally compromised staff who have been corrupted by organised crime syndicates.”

But what incentive would private owners have, to hand over rhinos to a stronghold in Kruger? According to Dziba, it’s a numbers game – you can only keep a limited number of rhinos per hectare, so housing privately owned rhinos is not a sustainable solution.

“There has to be some guarantee that they’re going to be preserved,” said Kathryn Straughan, who owns a small rhino crash with her husband Peter. “We don’t want them to die. It’s personal to us!”

Rian Labuschagne, who with his wife Lorna ran Zakouma National Park in Chad for African Parks and stopped elephant poaching in its tracks, said an open ecosystem like Serengeti-Mara-Ngorongoro was best, “but if all other measures are failing, then strongholds are imperative”.

Private custodians have a better anti-poaching record than the Kruger National Park. Whereas public entities are struggling to reverse the collapse in numbers, many private farms have managed to keep their rhinos safe in the smaller properties, comparable to small national parks. In some areas where poachers did hit private farms, owners banded together to supply collective security, reducing poaching to zero.

“One thing I had to learn very quickly was that every private rhino owner is a conservationist,” said Tersia Jooste of Rhino Connect, an organisation that represents 40 private rhino owners. “But these conservationists had to turn into soldiers, because they’re part of a war. They had to change the whole mindset.”

A private/government fund is needed to underwrite the cost of security held by private rhino owners who, while protecting the national herd, are incurring massive bills for ongoing security. Some have been forced to get rid of their animals.

There are problems with a declining gene pool. “The reason for us wanting to sell rhino,” said Straughan, “is we can’t have interbreeding here. We’ve only got a small herd and the two young males need to be moved on so they don’t breed with their own mothers and sisters. We’re trapped in a situation where there’s no value.”

Situations like this could threaten the long-term viability of the herds, endangering the rhino in yet another way. Some participants advocated creation of a system where bulls could be shared, perhaps including males from Kruger Park.

Bovine tuberculosis within the Kruger’s rhino population is a problem.

“We were selling rhinos to private owners with rhino strongholds in areas that were safer,” Dziba said. “Then we were hit by the discovery of TB in rhinos and the Department of Agriculture imposed a quarantine on Kruger. We’re not able to sell animals or move them out without a test to certify them being TB-free and that’s very expensive to administer.

“This has been a major setback for conservation, because we thought we’d be able to remove a significant number from harm’s way and contribute to growing rhino numbers.”

“TB is a very difficult disease,” wildlife veterinarian and founder of The Rhino Pride Foundation Dr Jana Pretorius agreed. “And today, it’s pretty much throughout Kruger.”

TB in rhinos can be managed, however, because its consequences are not as severe as they are for Cape Buffalo, for example. If the Kruger rhinos can be kept safe in a stronghold, they can breed and the numbers will increase, despite the reality of a TB-compromised crash.

Perceptions are key, said Lynn Johnson of Nature Needs More in Australia. “We were researching demand reduction campaigns but we stepped out because the trade debate was going on so long and pushing that line is incompatible with demand reduction.

“We decided to look into sustainable use and found there was no supply-chain transparency in the wildlife trade. I would prefer a conservation model, but if we’re going to have a trade model, without transparency there’s no proof of sustainability. Sustainable use is an ideology and not a strategy.

“I agree with Lynn,” said eco-economist Ross Harvey. “Demand will never be completely eradicated. But it does have to be radically reduced. And in order to do that, you need demand reduction campaigns, not information or awareness raising campaigns.”

The commodification of rhinos and horn is a major issue, noted Smaragda Louw of Ban Animal Trading. “The problem is if we give rhinos worth. Once they become private property, it becomes very difficult for NGOs – which are there to hold government accountable – to see where these animals are going. Giving animal and horn value is not a way to protect rhinos. This has huge implications for investment in the country.”

It’s time the international community stepped up to help to save rhinos. “One of the things we’ve been pushing is for the legal trade in endangered species to pay a levy,” said Johnson. “The value of the legal trade in endangered species is probably over US$500 billion today.

Some of the biggest companies in the world benefit from legal trade, be they luxury brands or architects or property developers. If they were paying 1% to 2% of the value of the legal trade into a central pot for conservation, you’d have a large fund for wildlife protection. Other industries pay a levy, so there’s no reason why companies profiting from the trade in endangered and exotic species should be exempt.”

We need to rethink stewardship – that was the view of Andrew Muir. “Stewardship is among the most powerful environmental legislation in our country and I don’t believe it’s been used adequately. It’s presently only about land. I think we need to lobby as a collective to add rhino and other important species to stewardship legislation so there’s a tax incentive. Not only to protect land for conservation but protect rhinos for conservation.”

Rhinos are climate warriors. “Talk of saving the rhino typically centres on preserving an ancient resource for posterity, said Lunn. “But focusing on the rhino’s income potential from tourism and the benefits that can flow to surrounding communities fell short of the rhino’s true importance.

“The rhino’s doing an unbelievable job in maintaining our climate and it does so disproportionately to other species. Rhinos are massive proliferators of seeds of grasslands through its dissemination of seeds.”

A University of California study found that grasslands are more resilient carbon sinks than forests in this unstable climate. “That should be part of the basis of our appeal to the world to support rhinos as creators of carbon sinks. This could be offset against carbon credits bringing much needed support to those taking care of rhinos.”

In conclusion to the debate, Muir said the key was to have rhinos protected for conservation with a management plan that protects them for the public good and the good of the planet.

“Then we could lobby for funds, both locally and internationally. But to engage locally and internationally you have to get trade in horn off the table.” The success of the debate underlined that conclusion.

We owe it to rhinos to let them live without persecution. Our lives are richer when we stop to marvel and reflect on what the wild creatures that share this planet have to teach us.

And a final note from a rhino. While we brainstormed her future, a 40-year-old rhino named Delilah (below) was quietly going about her morning in a remote location atop a mountain. Sitting quietly at the edge of a pan with two younger bulls by her side, her head, with its graceful, arching horn, rested amid a cluster of yellow flowers.

Beautiful and benign, her gaze seemed thoughtful. Did she understand the difficulty facing her ancient species? She’s an old rhino, a true elder. She’s witnessed poaching, heard the crack of gunshots and panicked humans shouting. But that morning everything was quiet. The pan reflected the surrounding grasses and trees and the three rhinos on its banks. Delilah contemplated the warm day, safe in her remote sanctuary, as we crouched behind cold computers, debating the future of her species. DM168


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 76089
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: Saving rhinos

Post by Richprins »

“If we establish a stronghold within Kruger,” he said, “we’re going to need resources and collaboration from private sector partners to ensure that we have zero poaching within that area.”

This makes sense in that it is an admission that Kruger staff are corrupted to a large extent.


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67563
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Saving rhinos

Post by Lisbeth »

Exactly my thought :yes:


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Peter Betts
Posts: 3084
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 9:28 am
Country: RSA
Contact:

Re: Saving rhinos

Post by Peter Betts »

Very suspicious article on Newsweek 24 this morning re night drive out of Satara with 20 tourists who came upon a Black Rhino having its Bloody horns being cut out >> lots of ducking and diving >> someone with computer skills may like to put this article up


User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67563
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Saving rhinos

Post by Lisbeth »



"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
Post Reply

Return to “Rhino Management and Poaching”