Mining in or Close to Protected Areas

Information and Discussions on Mining Issues
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67551
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Mining in or Close to Protected Areas

Post by Lisbeth »

Element Africa: Keeping platinum in the ground, and minors out of mines

by Mongabay.com on 4 November 2022

  • South Africa’s minister of mines has approved a platinum mine in the Vhembe Biosphere Reserve despite objections from a farming community of 500 whose homes sit atop the deposits.
  • The end of a government-funded program to incentivize parents in the Democratic Republic of Congo to keep their children in school has seen more than 250 return to working in cobalt mines.
  • It’s a different story in Kenya’s Makueni county, where strong local regulations are keeping minors, and criminal elements, out of the sand mining industry.
  • Element Africa is Mongabay’s bi-weekly bulletin rounding up brief stories from the commodities industry in Africa.


South Africa approves platinum mine despite community concerns

GA-NGWEPE, South Africa — South Africa’s minister of mineral resources and energy has approved a platinum mine in the Vhembe Biosphere Reserve, underneath the homes of about 500 rural people in Ga-Ngwepe, Limpopo province. On Oct. 13, Minister Gwede Mantashe rejected an appeal by the farming community of Early Dawn against the granting of a mining licence to Waterberg JV Resources (Pty) Ltd in 2018.

“What is so sad is that the majority of people who will be dispossessed are mainly women and children. We are literally on our own,” community leader Mamedi Ngoepe told Mongabay.

The minister also turned down the community’s appeal on the grounds that they did not adequately demonstrate their right to the land. He referred to a 26% share of the mine allocated to historically disadvantaged South Africans as fair compensation for the loss of their current way of life. However, this share in the platinum mining venture has not been allocated to the community, but to a tiny company owned by the vice president of Waterberg’s majority owner, Canada-based Platinum Group Minerals.

Ngoepe said he found it hard to believe that mining could be permitted anywhere in the Vhembe Biosphere Reserve, a 460,000-hectare (1.14-million-acre) expanse of forest, grassland and savanna that includes parts of Kruger National Park, the Thathe Vondo sacred forest, and the World Heritage Site at the ancient kingdom of Mapungubwe.

The biosphere holds hundreds of different species of insects, reptiles, birds and mammals. Vhembe and its buffer zones are also home to more than 1.5 million people, many of them farmers like the residents of Early Dawn.

The community, which has lived here since the 1940s, is now looking for lawyers to file a legal challenge to Waterberg’s license, on the basis that underground blasting will damage their homes and force them to leave their land and homes.

Image
Mapungubwe baobab landscape. The Vhembe Biosphere Reserve is an expanse of forest, grassland and savanna that includes parts of Kruger National Park, the Thathe Vondo sacred forest, and the World Heritage Site at Mapungubwe as well as major towns and farming communities like Early Dawn. Image by Martin Heigan via Flickr (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0).

Waterberg JV Resources’ compliance with environmental regulations at the site so far is poor: soon after it got its exploration license, it was found to be operating without a water use license, according to a government investigation. It was also found to be mining sand and drilling boreholes, which the community says caused their own water supply to run dry.

The mining consortium has still not secured a water use license, and the community plans to oppose its application for that as well.

Neither Platinum Group Metals nor DMRE spokespeople replied to questions sent by Mongabay.


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67551
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Mining in or Close to Protected Areas

Post by Lisbeth »

Hluhuluwe-iMfolozi Game Reserve threatened by ‘get-rich-quick’ coal prospecting rights

Image
Cavernous coal mining pits in the Somkhele area, surrounded by rural homesteads. (Photo: Rob Symons)

By Tony Carnie | 26 Feb 2023

Coal hunters have encircled Africa’s oldest game reserve to extract the rich ‘black gold’ deposits that fuel the furnaces of industry and the global climate crisis. The latest prospectors include former Banyana Banyana physician Dr Rodney Mokoka and his wife Whitney, along with Benedict ‘Benny’ Buthelezi, a Johannesburg-based advocate who has provided legal defence skills to former president Jacob Zuma and former SAA board chair Dudu Myeni.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
It has been almost three years since assassins snuffed out the awkward voice of dissent from 63-year-old grandmother Fikile Ntshangase. She was murdered at her rural home next to the Hluhuluwe-iMfolozi Game Reserve in northern KwaZulu-Natal, but the killers are still free.

Now it seems that the seemingly powerful opposition galvanised by Ma Ntshangase and fellow anti-coal-mining community members was little more than a pothole. The coal exploration wagon still rumbles forward at speed.

Last year, lawyers acting for Ma Ntshangase’s community won a significant victory when a high court judge found that the government acted illegally in extending coal mining rights to the Tendele Coal Mining company.

Image
Murdered activist Fikile Ntshangase. (Image: Sindiso Nyoni – R!OT Art + Design / Centre for Environmental Rights)

Judge Noluntu Bam likened Tendele’s behaviour during the mine extension process to that of an “unbridled horse that showed little or no regard for the law”.

Just short of a year on, Tendele has circulated letters in the Ophondweni, Emalahleni, Machibini and Mahujini areas to notify residents that the company will start fencing off land and building new coal-hauling access roads “from 06.00” on March 15 this year.

It remains unclear how many more residents will have to leave their homes, farmland and communities to make way for Tendele’s expanded coal mining operations.

But these residents are not alone in fearing for their future. It is a region where hundreds of people have been turfed out over recent decades.

Existing coal mines and new prospecting blocks now virtually encircle the Hluhuwe-iMfolozi park that was established in 1876 and which also incorporates one of the continent’s first “wilderness” zones.

Image
Increasingly large chunks of rural community land surrounding the Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park have been targeted for coal mining. (Graphic: Sheena Carnie)

Adjoining the northwest section of the park, the Zululand Anthracite Colliery (ZAC) also has plans to build a new shaft next to the Masokaneni community.

The ZAC mine, first developed in 1987 by the BHP Billiton group, has changed hands a number of times and is now owned by the Menar group, led by Turkish-born mechanical engineer Vuslat Bayoğlu.

(As an aside, property records show that the company’s name was changed briefly in 2005 to ‘Midnight Masquerade Properties 186’).

More recently, a company known as Imvukuzane Resources was granted environmental authorisation to sink 55 coal prospecting boreholes in the Fuleni area, which directly abuts the southern edge of the Hluhluwe-iMfolozi wilderness zone.

Full details of the Imvukuzane prospecting company were not advertised, but the government authorisation notice was sent to Gerhard Cronje (head of projects for Bayoğlu’s Menar/Canyon Coal group).

Our Burning Planet also searched the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) database and found that Imvukuzane has three directors: Bayoğlu; Ali Ihsan Naldoken and (former judge) Jerome Ngwenya, who chairs the Ingonyama Trust.

Previous attempts to mine the Fuleni area by the Ibutho Coal group met with strong resistance when it emerged that several hundred homes had been earmarked for destruction or relocation.

Just south of Fuleni, another new entrant is eyeing the land in the Ntambanana area, including the entire Thula Thula private game reserve, for coal prospecting rights.

Image
One of the many homesteads on the fence line of Tendele open cast coal mine near Mtubutuba. (Photo: Rob Symons)

This group, with no prior experience in coal mining, is RW Mokoka 7 Mining.

We searched the CIPC records and found that it has just two directors: Dr Rodney Mokoka and his wife, Whitney. Mokoka is a Pretoria-based physician who has served as team doctor for the Banyana Banyana national soccer team for several years. The couple also established the Mokoka Foundation, which sponsors soccer tournaments for youngsters in poor or rural areas.

One of his environmental consultants let slip that Mokoka has “about 20” other coal prospecting applications pending across the country — a statement confirmed by Mokoka himself when we spoke to him later.

Mokoka told us his interest in coal mining was sparked while working as a doctor in Emalahleni (Witbank) for seven years, where he “got to know some guys who are very competent (in the coal industry)”, including geologists and metallurgists.

“As a doctor, you can bring huge change to patients’ lives, but in mining you can bring huge change at a broader community level and also create jobs and training . . . If there is someone who generates revenue it’s not all about you. You are giving others hope on a bigger scale.”

When asked about the often negative social and environmental impacts of coal mining, Mokoka said: “Yes, we need green energy, but the transition will take 10 – 15 years. So, in short, there are hunger and health issues (now). So we have to plan and have a balance while limiting carbon emissions.”

Conceding that he had no experience in the coal mining business, Mokoka gave no indication of how he planned to raise capital or skills to establish a mining operation. He also dodged a direct question on whether he was acting on behalf of bigger players.

Image
Rodney and Whitney Mokoka. (Photo: Rodney’s Facebook page 2016)

Similar question marks swirl around another nearby coal prospecting venture by a company registered in 2017 as Yengo Resources. CIPC records show that the sole director is Benedict Nqabayethu Buthelezi, a Johannesburg advocate who has provided legal services to Jacob Zuma, Dudu Myeni and businessman Peter-Paul Ngwenya.

Ngwenya, a businessman and former Robben Island detainee, was fined R24,000 by a Randburg magistrate three years ago for crimen injuria after describing former business associate and friend Fani Titi a “QwaQwa k****r” and “Bantustan boss”.

When we contacted him for comment and clarity on his recent Yengo mining venture, Buthelezi suggested that practising law and an interest in mining were not “mutually exclusive”.

Buthelezi said he grew up in the Ulundi area in KZN and was approached by local community members to lodge a coal prospecting application on their behalf.

“We are working with the local chief and induna to do this application … I’m not a miner, but the Ulundi area is highly impoverished and there are no job opportunities.”

Buthelezi did not elaborate on who would provide capital and skills if his application was successful, but Our Burning Planet has seen official correspondence that Yengo has an “in-principle partnership agreement” with a relatively obscure company called Northfield Coal.

Image
Quinten Swart is listed as the chief executive officer of the Northfield Coal Company. (Screengrab: LinkedIn)

CIPC records suggest that Northfield was registered in 2017 and is based in Utrecht, KZN. The listed directors are Quinten Claud Swart, Francis John Joslin, Malcolm Keith Johnson and Johannes Alfred Gerber.

The recent scramble for new prospecting and mining licences around Hluhluwe-iMfolozi comes at a time when demand for thermal coal and coking coal is rising sharply, despite urgent calls by climate-change scientists to shift sharply from fossil fuels to renewable energy.

The price of coal reached an all-time high of $457.80/tonne in September 2022, before plummeting over recent months to just over $135/tonne.

Image
Mountains of coal await export from the Richard Bay Coal Terminal. (Photo: RBCT / Andre Meyer Photography)

According to the International Energy’s Coal 2022 analysis: “Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has sharply altered the dynamics of coal trade, price levels, and supply and demand patterns in 2022 . . . This has prompted a wave of fuel switching away from gas, pushing up demand for more price-competitive options, including coal in some regions.

“Russia is the third largest coal exporter in the world and the sanctions have as a result given rise to a reshuffling of global trade flows as buyers, especially in Europe, seek alternative supplies. . . . The gap left by Russian coal supplies in Europe has been largely filled by South Africa, Colombia and other smaller producers such as Tanzania and Botswana.”

Late last year, former New Zealand prime minister Helen Clark warned that growing demand for coal was likely to push mining companies into more environmentally and socially sensitive areas across the globe.

“Pressure to approve new mines quickly could mean not enough time is allocated for consultation and impact assessment. In many countries, we are already seeing a move towards streamlined or fast-tracked approval processes, and while the motivations for that may be legitimate there is a risk of harm to communities and environment if there are not enough safeguards,” she said.

Image
Goats graze next to a mountain of coal mine residue. (Photo: Rob Symons)

Bayoğlu of Menar and Tendele’s chief Jan du Preez have both been scathing in their criticism of community members and activists who have pushed back against the mining onslaught around Hluhluwe-iMfolozi, characterising them as “job destroyers”.

(Aside: Both these coal executives drive Porsches, according to profile interview brags with Mining Weekly.)

Jeremy Ridl, an environmental attorney representing the Umfolozi Big Five Trust, suggests that in its present structure, the South African coal mining industry only benefits the economic elite.

The trust administers several community areas proclaimed as nature reserves and incorporated into Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park, with two lodges currently in operation.

In a recent submission to the Department of Minerals Resources and Energy, Ridl suggested that the department’s basic assessment process was nothing less than a “licence to destroy”.

“It is being used to justify avoidable destruction. It envisages trashing the homeland of a community and offers them nothing in return.”

Nor did the basic assessment process for the Yengo coal prospecting application consider the wider issue of land rights for marginalised and vulnerable communities.

“The land identified is another example of miners choosing soft targets, where disempowered communities have no resources to defend their rights, their heritage, their culture or their wellbeing. Is this ethical? Is this consistent with the spirit of ubuntu?” he asked.

Who would profit from the mine? How much profit would remain in the local area after people gave up their land for mining?

“As history suggests, applications for prospecting and mining rights are horribly one-sided and communities such as my clients, are powerless to have an equal say in the decision of the competent authorities, who traditionally, strongly favour mining, as indeed it is their mandate to promote mining.”

Image
Women from the Mfolozi Community Environmental Justice Organisation (MCEJO) demonstrate outside the PIetermaritzburg High Court. (Photo: Supplied)

“The current application, being for prospecting rights, is obviously relatively non-invasive, and the impacts are obviously minimal when compared to mining. This will be used as the justification for the grant of the prospecting rights.

“This is not the point. Armed with prospecting rights, and if the target mineral is found to exist in viable quantities, the probabilities are that a mining right will be issued.”

It was, therefore, necessary at an early stage, while considering the merits of an application for a prospecting right, that the merits of an application for a mining right should also be considered.

“It is a pointless exercise to consider the impacts of prospecting alone, when the true impacts will only be felt during mining. It is equally pointless to issue a prosecting right if ultimately mining is unacceptable in the proposed area.”

Ridl also noted that the current national Minerals minister, Gwede Mantashe, had publicly pinned his colours to the cause of mining.

“This inspires no confidence that his decision will be fair to affected communities … These comments are accordingly submitted with the expectation that they will be ignored, and that this matter will ultimately be resolved on appeal to the Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment, or more likely, on judicial review by the high court.”

Image
Coal awaits export from the Richards Bay Coal Terminal. (Photo: RBCT)

Similar concerns have been raised by Durban attorney Kirsten Youens, who represents communities in the Mpukonyoni and Somkhele area.

“It is our experience that the decisions made by government are too often blinkered by the promise of employment and other socio-economic benefits without weighing these benefits up.”

Her colleague, attorney Janice Tooley, says: “One thing is for sure, the whole region is under siege.

“We need to start looking at cumulative impacts on water, climate change, sustainable livelihoods and community cohesion and cultural heritage, food security, biodiversity, and ecotourism … I can’t see how any of these mines can be viewed as sustainable development, but rather short-term gain for a relatively few — and widespread, intergenerational destruction for the majority.” DM/OBP


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67551
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Mining in or Close to Protected Areas

Post by Lisbeth »

Critical Verlorenvlei Estuary under threat of mining and death by a thousand cuts

Image
The Verlorenvlei estuarine lake looking west towards the ocean. Photo courtesy of Brian Dyson.

By Kate Handley | 17 Jul 2023
Kate Handley is an environmental attorney and co-founder of the Biodiversity Law Centre, a non-profit organisation that seeks to use the law to reverse the catastrophic decline of biological diversity in southern Africa.

The Verlorenvlei Estuary is one of South Africa’s treasures. But this critical ecosystem faces an onslaught that threatens its unique biodiversity, the most recent a tungsten mining application in the Verlorenvlei catchment.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Nestled between the towns of Redelinghuys to the east and Elands Bay to the west lies the Verlorenvlei Estuary. Its serene beauty not only attracts visitors but also underscores the estuary’s ecological significance as a sanctuary for diverse flora and fauna.

This remarkable ecosystem hosts significant biodiversity. It was proclaimed as a Ramsar site on 28 June 1991 under the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance, one of only 29 Ramsar sites in South Africa.

It is also designated by BirdLife South Africa as an Important Bird and Biodiversity Area, supporting abundant and rich birdlife, particularly waterbirds, a variety of endangered mammal species, and several indigenous fish.

Read more in Daily Maverick: South Africa’s endangered wetlands need protecting

The Verlorenvlei Estuary boasts rich biodiversity and offers a variety of tourism, recreational, health, educational, and other social benefits that directly uplift local livelihoods. It provides essential nursery areas for the sustenance and productivity of estuarine-dependent fish populations, thereby playing a vital role in bolstering local and broader marine-based economies.

It actively contributes to mitigating the effects of climate change by effectively sequestering and storing carbon from the atmosphere.

Vulnerability of Verlorenvlei

The trouble is that Verlorenvlei is facing significant and increasing pressures from substantial flow reduction (including through the construction of illegal dams and excessive abstraction of water from the Verlorenvlei catchment), extensive agricultural transformation of the estuarine functional zone, and increased pollution. The system is also particularly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, exacerbating its persistence in an already water-stressed area.

The result? Verlorenvlei is literally drying up. These impacts are reducing Verlorenvlei’s ability to provide key services such as nutrient cycling and nursery habitat. The mouth of the estuary has not been breached in years and its recreational and tourism value are also being compromised. The desiccation is rapidly eroding the biodiversity of this unique site.

For several years Verlorenvlei held no fish, given that there was no connection to the sea, no connection to the wider catchment, and rapidly deteriorating water quality. Water bird species diversity also declined significantly from 39 species to just 22 species in the last four years.

This is a crisis, inflicting its toll upon a lonely ecosystem tucked away on South Africa’s West Coast, hidden from sight, and regrettably overlooked in terms of its significance.

A study to determine the ecological reserve of the Verlorenvlei catchment (the amount of water needed to maintain ecological integrity) is currently underway, but there is some uncertainty regarding the finalisation of this process, and whether its recommendations will be sufficient to save the vlei.

A new threat

As if the above threats were not enough, Verlorenvlei is facing a new threat. This time, a mining application that will significantly impact the catchment on which the Vlei depends.

Bongani Minerals (Pty) Ltd, with assistance from Greenmined Environmental (Pty) Ltd, has applied to the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy for the right to mine heavy minerals such as tungsten and molybdenum on properties located in the Moutonshoek Protected Environment.

Read more in Daily Maverick: Alert sounded over mining prospectors eyeing treasures of last unspoilt strip along Western Cape’s west coast

Moutonshoek protects the Krom Antonies River catchment, the main tributary of the Verlorenvlei system. This is in fact a renewed threat, as Bongani has previously applied a few times — unsuccessfully — to mine the same area. The Draft Scoping Report in terms of the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations was open for public comment until 3 July 2023.

Image
Map depicting location of mining site (yellow triangle) within the Moutonshoek Protected Environment and in relation to Verlorenvlei, extracted from the Draft Scoping Report.

In its comments, the Biodiversity Law Centre noted that this application is extremely concerning for a number of reasons.

Firstly, the mine is proposed within a protected environment, proclaimed to conserve an important representative sample of threatened ecosystem types. Mining in a protected environment is prohibited.

However, in terms of the recently amended section 48 of the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act, it may be permitted with the minister of forestry, fisheries and the environment’s consent upon consideration of certain factors (including the ecological integrity of the protected environment).

Mining in a protected environment undermines international commitments made by South Africa in agreeing to the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.

Specifically, South Africa has committed to increasing its land area under effective conservation through expanded protected areas and Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures to 30% by 2030. Efforts should therefore be made to conserve and expand South Africa’s protected area estate, not erode it.

In this instance, mining is also entirely inconsistent with the objectives of the Moutonshoek Protected Environment Management Plan, including the conservation of biodiversity.

Secondly, mining operations in the Moutonshoek pose a significant threat to Verlorenvlei, as explicitly acknowledged in the Draft Scoping Report. Mining requires water, and a lot of it, and this mine will be particularly reliant on groundwater resources, so says the Draft Scoping Report. The depletion of groundwater resources, upon which Verlorenvlei relies, looms as a disconcerting risk of the proposed mining activities.

Additionally, the presence of a tailings dam connected to the mine raises grave concerns about potential groundwater contamination, endangering the delicate balance of the Verlorenvlei system and its valuable biodiversity.

Moreover, the threat of sedimentation or pollution of the Krom Antonies River, the primary tributary of Verlorenvlei, further accentuates the vulnerability of this ecosystem. Not to mention the impacts on the community, who will effectively be evicted from their land to make way for the mine, and the laughable suggestion that socioeconomic and biodiversity impacts might be acceptably mitigated.

Protecting vulnerable ecosystems

Our environmental legislation emphasises the importance and vulnerability of ecosystems such as wetlands, which require specific attention in management and planning procedures.

Furthermore, the recently published White Paper on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of South Africa’s Biodiversity reveals the concerning reality that estuaries and wetlands, despite being the most threatened ecosystem types, receive the least protection. Less than 2% of their total area is categorised as “well protected”. South African law and policy therefore clearly dictates that wetlands and estuaries should be treated with particular care.

Yet despite this apparent legal protection, Verlorenvlei is suffering death by the proverbial thousand cuts. Unlawful water abstraction, illegal dams, rampant agricultural expansion and now mining. How much more must this fragile ecosystem endure?

As it is, Verlorenvlei is fast being degraded beyond the point at which it may recover. Yet its significance cannot be overstated. Its peaceful beauty, rich biodiversity, and vital ecological functions make it a precious gem that demands our protection.

Preserving Verlorenvlei is not only crucial for the well-being of local communities and the environment, but also for the collective responsibility we hold in safeguarding the wonders of Nature so that future generations too may benefit. DM


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67551
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Mining in or Close to Protected Areas

Post by Lisbeth »

:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil:


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67551
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Mining in or Close to Protected Areas

Post by Lisbeth »

ImageImage


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67551
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Mining in or Close to Protected Areas

Post by Lisbeth »

New push for coal mine on Kruger National Park boundary raises alarm

Image
Lions cross the Crocodile River. (Photo: Tingana Collection)

By Tony Carnie | 23 Oct 2023

An obscure mining company has revived a rejected proposal under a new name – and Kruger management says it has been kept in the dark about an environmental impact assessment that omits the park.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The impacts on the Kruger National Park are not discussed at all… The locality maps in the draft report do not indicate the ­proximity of the mine to [the park]… It is highly questionable as to whether the omission has been done on purpose. – Oscar Mthimkhulu, managing executive, Kruger National Park

A controversial plan to mine coal on the southern boundary of the Kruger National Park has been revived, raising concern about what this means for the country’s best-known wildlife sanctuary – as well as for surrounding ecotourism lodges, the agricultural economy and scarce water resources.

The initial plan was launched in 2018 by a relatively unknown mining company, Manzolwandle Investments, based in Emala­hleni (Witbank). It involved both opencast and underground mines over a massive 18,000ha swathe of land bordering the park.

That first proposal was rejected by the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy in 2020 after vociferous objections. Now it has been revived by the same mining group using a different name and different environmental consultants.

Image
Although the size of the original mining plan has been scaled back, the latest version still includes blasting coal adjacent to the Kruger National Park and several private lodges and farming areas Map: Sheena Carnie

The latest venture, under the name of Tenbosch Mining, has been scaled down considerably and now involves a smaller 6,500ha parcel of land east of the Komatipoort border post.

Nevertheless, Tenbosch and its new environmental consultants, Kimopax, appear not to have consulted the park custodian, South African National Parks (SANParks), even though the revised plan still involves mining rights almost touching the Kruger border.

Alarmingly, SANParks has suggested that its exclusion from the environmental impact assessment (EIA) consultation process may have been deliberate.

In a letter to Kimopax on 26 September, Kruger managing executive Oscar Mthimkhulu says the draft EIA report does not address potential impacts on the world-­renowned tourist destination that receives nearly two million visitors annually.

Image
An elephant in the Kruger National Park. December 2022. (Photo: Warren Little / Getty Images)

“The locality maps [in the report] also do not indicate the proximity of the mine to Kruger National Park, yet the names of other places are indicated… The omission of the Kruger National Park and its role in the region is concerning. An EIA report should contain detailed information to allow the competent authorities to make an informed decision.

“It is highly questionable as to whether this omission of the Kruger National Park has been done on purpose.”

Mthimkhulu says SANParks environmental experts in the park were also not notified about the availability of the Kimopax EIA report so that they could make comments.

“The Kruger National Park was made aware of the mining application through other stakeholders,” he said, further noting that SANParks was not listed as the management authority or even as an interested or affected party.

Park ecologists have several concerns about the plan, ranging from the impact of mining on tourism and the park’s unique sense of place to pollution by dust, noise, light and water.

Mthimkhulu notes that tourism is highly concentrated in the southern part of the park and more than 1.3 million visitors entered via the southern gates in the past financial year. This section includes the Crocodile Bridge and Malelane entrance gates and at least four popular tourist camps: Crocodile Bridge, Biyamiti, Malelane and Berg-en-Dal.

The potential impacts of mining on the ecology and ecotourism could be “drastic”, said Mthimkhulu, noting that the mining industry and several government agencies had collaborated more than a decade ago to jointly produce the 2013 Mining and Biodiversity Guideline. It aimed to avoid or mitigate the impacts of mining on South Africa’s biological treasures.

No coal extraction is planned inside the Kruger, but research from other reserves has shown that mining can lead to several direct or indirect effects on animal life in the vicinity.

Image
Elephants feed along the banks of the Crocodile River, close to where a new coal mine is planned – Image: Tingana Collection

Toxic chemicals released

For example, acid mine drainage and other toxic chemicals released in the mining process can flow into rivers and streams, poisoning fish and other aquatic life, including larger species such as crocodiles.

The Olifants River, which flows through the Kruger, is already significantly polluted from coal mining in Mpumalanga.

Indirect impacts from blasting noise, vibrations or light pollution can also lead to the displacement of some wildlife species, and air pollution associated with opencast mining can lead to high levels of fine dust particles that coat the leaves of plants, reducing their capacity for photosynthesis.

The potential impact is not only on the Kruger, but also on several ecotourism lodges and private reserves that have been developed along the southern banks of the Crocodile River, as well as large-scale irrigated farms for sugar cane, fruit and other crops. Examples include Ngwenya Lodge and Buckler’s Africa Lodge as well as the Marloth Park wildlife sanctuary and holiday township.

Image
Buckler’s Africa Lodge is one of several tourism establishments located close to the proposed coal mine. (Photo: Tingana Collection)

Yet the Kimopax report appears to fudge critical questions about the likely impacts of mining on the park, neighbouring ecotourism lodges and the agricultural economy.

The report is also vague about the project’s financial backing and proposed mining methods, presenting the venture as an exclusively underground operation. Yet a closer reading suggests that opencast mining could be a way to raise funds for future underground mines.

“The coal mined [from opencast areas] can be sold to other local mining companies. This will allow generation of capital to alleviate the capital expenditure burden while developing the underground mine,” says Kimopax. This suggests that the company is currently unable to finance a major underground operation.

Kimopax states that the operation and maintenance of the processing plant will be outsourced to a contractor, raising further questions about the capacity of Tenbosch, whose directors are listed as Phiki Raymond Zulu and Phillip Zephania Mkhatshwa.

Daily Maverick sent questions to Kimopax requesting clarity on the apparent exclusion of SANParks from the consultation process.

Kimopax insisted that it had “consulted” two SANParks officials, but did not specify when these engagements took place.

Daily Maverick has established that one of those SANParks officials left the organisation more than a year ago, and the second has also left SANParks and has been working in Zambia since May.

We also asked why Tenbosch needed an independent contractor to operate the plant; what experience the company had in coal mining; and whether it could provide details of its current coal mining operations.

Image
Environmental consultant Lufuno Nengwani with some of his equipment. Photo: Geoluken Consulting website

In response to our queries, Kimopax environmental assessment practitioner Lufuno Nengwani said: “Be rest assured [sic], Tenbosch company personnel have experience in mining.

“Typically, a mining project encompasses multiple phases within its development cycle. At Tenbosch, we believe in a comprehensive and strategic approach to our mining development life cycle.

“Human resource recruitment and the appointment of independent contractors are integral components of our evolving process. The decision to appoint independent contractors for some of our operational processes should not be misconstrued [as] lack of resources or capacity within Tenbosch.”
-Kimopax-Response-Letter-to-Daily-Maverick.pdf
(388.8 KiB) Downloaded 25 times
However, the Marloth Park Property Owners Association and other groups remain concerned about several aspects of the coal venture and the manner in which the EIA process is being conducted.

Agriculture stands to lose

One example involves job creation, and Kimopax and Tenbosch are punting the coal plan as a major venture that will help to uplift impoverished communities. Though it seemingly failed to notify SANParks, the mining company laid on several buses to ferry residents of three local community wards to a public meeting at the Mdladla community hall on 23 September.

Although an initial scoping report by environmental consultants called Limp Earth suggested that the mine would create about 90 permanent jobs, the new Kimopax report bumps this figure up to “approximately 300 workers”, mostly from surrounding areas.

Kimopax amplifies the job creation message but appears to place less emphasis on potentially negative impacts such as the loss of agricultural land and displacement of other livelihoods.

According to independent consultant Dr Christine McGladdery, nearly 5,800 people from local communities benefit directly from Marloth Park’s tourism and hospitality industry, and the agricultural sector also employs people who stand to lose their jobs if farms or game ranches are converted to coal mining.

McGladdery, on behalf of Marloth Park, observes that local stakeholders were given only five days to review and comment on hundreds of pages of Kimopax EIA reports.

Another major concern is that these reports appear to focus almost exclusively on the initial 200ha targeted for mining, rather than the entire 6,500ha area that Tenbosch hopes to develop in future phases.

Nengwani disagreed with this interpretation, saying that if the mining project were to be modified the company would “adhere to relevant regulations” and conduct further studies prior to future mining operations.

However, McGladdery says environmental authorisation does not differentiate between different types of mining in one application. If a mining right were to be granted, there would be nothing to stop the entire area from being mined using noisier and more intrusive opencast blasting.

For local farmers, one of the biggest concerns is the volume of water needed by a mining operation that aims to extract up 20 million tonnes of coal per year.

Image
Stockpiles of coal await export from the Richards Bay Coal Terminal. Image RBCT

As well as potential pollution from acid mine drainage into rivers and dams, landowners fear the depletion and pollution of groundwater around the mining areas.

Although several of these questions remain unanswered, the clock is ticking for government approval.

According to Kimopax, a public consultation meeting will be held at the Marloth Park community hall on 21 October. After that, a final EIA report will be submitted to the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy on 21 November for approval. DM

This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R29.


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67551
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Mining in or Close to Protected Areas

Post by Lisbeth »

This is the craziest thing that I have ever read about mining 0- 0-

It will never pass the EIA though......I hope O-/


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67551
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Mining in or Close to Protected Areas

Post by Lisbeth »

Gwede MIA again while ecologically important Rietvlei and surrounding communities at risk

Image
Zebra crossing at Rietvlei Nature Reserve, on the border between Centurion and Ekurhuleni municipality, a ‘green lung’ and a massively popular wildlife destination among Gauteng residents. As the Corobrik saga unfolds, uncertainties loom over the environmental integrity of the Rietvlei Nature Reserve and its surroundings. (Photo: Angus Begg)

By Angus Begg | 11 Feb 2024

With the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy apparently missing in action, the ambitions of Corobrik to mine above-ground coal at its Rietvlei operation threaten environmental havoc, and highlight for the umpteenth time, polluted skies and a smelly can of worms far downstream.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
In a move that has raised eyebrows and environmental concerns, leading brick manufacturer Corobrik is waiting for permission from Mineral Resources and Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe to mine the untapped surface coal deposits at its open-cast clay brick production facility next to the serene Rietvlei Nature Reserve in Gauteng on Centurion’s eastern edge.

The application has sparked concern over the very likely adverse effects on local water and air quality, compounding existing environmental challenges faced by the reserve – home to a rare peatland as well as rhino, buffalo, cheetah and birdlife – and the surrounding population.

Seven years of dust

“There will be considerable dust during construction and operational phases due to the nature of the activity,” said “X”, a Centurion-based environmental consultant well acquainted with the Rietvlei area, who wishes to remain anonymous for professional reasons.

These phases, according to Corobrik’s application, are expected to last up to seven years.

Image
An African stonechat pictured on the Rietvlei wetland. At ‘about 8km long and at some places 600m wide’, Rietvlei is one of the largest peatlands in a protected area in South Africa. Peatland is acknowledged globally as one of the most efficient carbon sinks on earth. Only one percent of all peatlands occur in Africa and South America combined. (Photo: Angus Begg)

“The likelihood of heightened air pollution, especially given the open-cast mining environment, is real,” X said, adding that concerns extend beyond the mine’s immediate vicinity, with projections of increased heavy traffic along Delmas Road and “the R51, one of the main ‘coal avenues’ to nearby power stations and Witbank, possibly for export from Richards Bay”.

It is a picture that calls to mind the now-ubiquitous image of endless trains of trucks carting huge volumes of coal along the roads of every province north of the Cape, blocking road flow and chewing up unmaintained provincial roads in the process, from North West and Limpopo to Free State, Mpumalanga and KwaZulu-Natal.

While the mine is legally bound to monitor dust and develop dust monitoring plans, Daily Maverick has been informed by a reliable source that the application lacks air-quality modelling and health impact studies, raising questions about the true extent of the envisaged impact of air pollution.

Threat of acid mine drainage

Mariette Liefferink, of the Federation for a Sustainable Environment – a civic watchdog organisation that uses South Africa’s Constitution to both protect communities from the negative impacts of mining and secure access to clean water – reinforced the gravity of the situation, saying the proposed mining of coal posed a real threat.

“Coal mining … is considered a category A mine, with significant impacts on water, since pyrite occurs in the coal deposits.”

When pyrite reacts with oxygen, it releases sulphuric acid, which can cause acid mine drainage (AMD), which Liefferink describes as a serious environmental problem in South Africa and globally.

“AMD is not only associated with surface and groundwater pollution, but is also responsible for the degradation of soil quality, aquatic habitats and for allowing heavy metals to seep into the environment.”

Any such addition of AMD to the water management area without mitigation would further damage the already compromised environment, Liefferink said.

Worth protecting

At about eight kilometres long and at some places 600m wide, the Rietvlei wetland – much of which is in the nature reserve – is correctly known as “peatland”, acknowledged by many as one of the most efficient carbon sinks on Earth, according to Hennops Revival founder Tarryn Johnston.

Rietvlei is one of the largest peatlands in a protected area in South Africa. According to various scientific studies, including from the Agricultural Research Council, peatland is a “rare feature in the southern African landscape”.

Image
Tsessebe framed on the threatened grasslands of Rietvlei Nature Reserve. The reserve, which NPOs and NGOs say will be impacted negatively by Corobrik’s application to mine coal at its brick facility on the reserve’s boundary, is a level one protected area, home to around 2000 different animals, cheetah and buffalo among them. (Photo: Angus Begg)

Also rare is the reserve’s endangered Bankenveld grassland “and a level one protected area, home to around 2,000 different animals and 240 different bird species”.

“The only way to truly protect the Rietvlei dam and surrounding nature reserve is to buffer around the reserve, protect it so that no one can ever mine,” X said.

Liefferink said public concerns about Corobrik’s wish to “mine, remove and store” coal deposits near the Rietvlei Dam and nature reserve had to be addressed.

Rietvlei’s existing water woes

The Rietvlei Nature Reserve and surrounding areas are already grappling with severe water quality issues, which cut across multiple municipalities and highlight how possible pollution from the Corobrik mine could exacerbate the intractable situation.

The Rietvlei Dam, a critical water source within the reserve, receives inflow from various tributaries, including the Rietvlei River. These are tainted by raw sewage from multiplying and burgeoning informal settlements, builders’ rubble and industrial and agricultural pollutants, all unchecked by any form of local, provincial or national policing.

Also on the river’s path en route to the Rietvlei wetland, which gives rise to the dam, is Ekurhuleni’s Hartbeesfontein wastewater treatment works (WWTW), which statistics reveal is in a calamitous state.

Image
The private sector has been taking the lead in trying to find a solution to the water crisis — involving the Johannesburg, Ekurhuleni and Tshwane metros — affecting downstream recreational spaces like, for example, the Rietvlei Dam and Hennops River. The Hennops Revival NPO in this case organised a public meeting between concerned stakeholders and various tiers of government in October 2023, at which the municipalities‘ ’action plans‘ were meant to be presented. Hennops Revival’s auditors sponsored the event with food and beverages, yet no-one delivered an action plan. It was agreed that the parties would meet again in January.

Image
A DWS graph showing effluent water quality compliance discharging into the relevant Ekurhuleni rivers, which flow into the Rietvlei Nature Reserve and dam — which then flows into the Hennops River. Of interest to consumers should be the ecoli count. With the acceptable industry standard for drinking water at 0 counts per 100ml and recreational use at 300-500 counts, the Hartbeesfontein wastewater treatment works is discharging water into the Rietvlei River with an coli count of over two million counts per 100ml. Consultant X says the Hennops may have eight million counts per 100ml. (Image: DWS (Dept Water and Sanitation)

“E. coli levels (in the water discharged by Hartbeesfontein) in the Rietvlei River were in the multiple millions in April 2023,” X said.

That water eventually joins the polluted Kaalspruit from Tembisa to form the Hennops River.

“Eight million parts E. coli per 100ml were measured in the Hennops last year, but that’s nothing compared to the 24 million in the Kaalspruit.”

Read more in Daily Maverick: Total lack of accountability as South Africa’s rivers choke on waste

City of Tshwane MMC for Environment and Agricultural Management Ziyanda Zwane described a downstream disaster of epic proportions and municipal design.

Image
The grey-green Hennops River is the recipient of plastics, effluent, chemical and agricultural pollution arriving via a variety of sources in the Ekurhuleni municipalities — the Hartbeesfontein sewage farm among them. (Photo: Angus Begg)

Image
One day of solid rain is enough for the river to flood the banks of the Hennops, as Daily Maverick has seen, leaving litter and effluent covering pavements, roads, golf courses and commercial precincts for weeks afterwards. The once locally famed Centurion Hotel was forced to close because of the situation. (Photo: Angus Begg)

“The Kaalspruit is heavily polluted as a result of the impact of mushrooming informal settlements in Tembisa, which falls under Ekurhuleni, and the invasion of the Kaalfontein wetland, which falls under City of Johannesburg,” Zwane said.

When asked for comment on the Kaalspruit having an E. coli reading of more than 55 million counts per 100ml – as per the 2021 South African Human Rights Commission’s (SAHRC) damning report – and five other pertinent questions, the Ekurhuleni municipality responded with a paragraph declaring that “there is inconvertible scientific evidence that the (Olifantsfontein WWTW) plant actually helps the (Hennops) River particularly on microbiological compliance, as the E. coli upstream of the plant is high”.

“I want to sh… myself,” was X’s response. “That is not a way to justify your own pollution.”

Zwane, from the City of Tshwane, said “unmanaged (population) growth” in neighbouring Ekurhuleni led to the river system being used as a mechanism for disposal of untreated effluent and municipal solid waste.

Image
The founder of the award-winning Hennops Revival NGO, Tarryn Johnston, says they have a ‘great working relationship’ with the city of Tshwane. She says Joburg and Ekurhuleni municipalities pitch up at … meetings, but that ‘as at a national level, any action is unfortunately absent’. (Photo: Tarryn Johnston, founder and CEO of Hennops Revival)

Image
In the absence of government concern and action, says Hennops Revival’s Tarryn Johnston, the private sector has started to invest in the future through credible NGOs, which she says is where the greatest changes seem to be unfolding. (Photo: Tarryn Johnston, founder and CEO of Hennops Revival)

He added that illegal sand mining in both the Olifantspruit and the Kaalspruit led to “thousands of tons of river sand washing down, much of which gets deposited into the Centurion Lake, which serves as a de facto silt trap”.

X said: “Authorities have allowed upstream pollution from sewer plants and other harmful water uses to continue unchecked.”

X doubted whether the municipalities could undo the damage. “They probably are understaffed and underskilled and under-supported in some instances, compounded by lack of resources and the complete failure of local authorities.”

Corobrik’s application

If the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy (DMRE) does grant Corobrik the licence to mine the coal at its brick factory, the existing state of the Rietvlei suggests there is little chance that the City of Tshwane has the requisite staff or skills to monitor potential pollution.

While the proposed Corobrik mine is situated in Tshwane, Zwane emphasised that mining activities fell outside the city’s jurisdiction. He said the city had “raised concerns about Corobrik’s application and will appeal any decision that compromises the environment”.

Image
‘Our meetings with DWS and metros have been attended by representatives of all the metros and national DWS, and highlighted ongoing concerns, but in the end, its conclusion seems to be that it is easier to break the law than it is to enforce it.’ (Photo: Tarryn Johnston, founder and CEO of Hennops Revival)

Liefferink said Corobrik had to manage its mine as per its environmental management plan commitments and not pollute, “so that if pollution occurs, the law will follow its course”.

“Unfortunately everything in SA doesn’t always work as it should and any proper process could be ignored or denied or corrupted, such as the damage caused by mismanaged treatment works, and the Department of Water and Sanitation’s lack of action due to corporate misgovernance,” X said.

While concerns have been raised about corporate responsibility and municipal capacity – and taking into consideration that the City of Tshwane was castigated by the SAHRC for the barely functioning state of a number of its WWTWs – Zwane said Tshwane was committed to a more sustainable and ecologically responsible future.

Unanswered questions

Whether a “sustainable future” is in the pipeline for the Rietvlei environment seems to be up in the air, with Corobrik directing questions to consultants Licebo Environmental and Mining (Pty) Ltd.

Licebo environmental scientist Johny Mafego would only confirm that “the final basic assessment report (BAR) and environmental management programme (EMPr) was submitted to the Department of Mineral Resources and Energy (DMRE) on the 12th of October 2023”, in turn directing Daily Maverick to the DMRE for comment.

However, repeated questions put to the DMRE have been unanswered, which some would link to a state of paralysis in the department.

The preservation and restoration of environmental and public health in a large chunk of the country’s financial heartland, meanwhile, awaits the DMRE’s decisive action and collaborative effort.

“Don’t forget, 20% of Tshwane’s drinking water is extracted from Rietvlei dam,” Johnston said. DM


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 76082
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: Mining in or Close to Protected Areas

Post by Richprins »

It is astounding how they litter in the townships and settlements along the rivers. :evil:


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 67551
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Mining in or Close to Protected Areas

Post by Lisbeth »

Civil education = 0!


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
Post Reply

Return to “Mining and Other Extraction Issues”