Questionable Buffalo and Hippo culling in Kruger

Information and Discussions on Management Issues of Concern in Kruger
Post Reply
User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 75371
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: Questionable Culling in Kruger

Post by Richprins »

Ja, but the idea is to keep it and eat it in the Park, nana. Certain meat may not leave the Lowveld due to disease control! \O


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
User avatar
nan
Posts: 26480
Joined: Thu May 31, 2012 9:41 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Central Europe
Contact:

Re: Questionable Culling in Kruger

Post by nan »

so O-/ they can have disease inside the park 0-


Kgalagadi lover… for ever
https://safrounet.piwigo.com/
User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 75371
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: Questionable Culling in Kruger

Post by Richprins »

Yes, nana! Diseases like Anthrax and Foot and Mouth, and now Bovine Tuberculosis are endemic to the Park. They try to keep them away from farms further inland! Remember, wild animals can handle them, but they will wipe out domestic herds, or make them unusable. \O


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
User avatar
Lisbeth
Site Admin
Posts: 65895
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 12:31 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Lugano
Contact:

Re: Questionable Culling in Kruger

Post by Lisbeth »

They have been suffering from all those diseases for years as far as I know -O-


"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world." Nelson Mandela
The desire for equality must never exceed the demands of knowledge
User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 75371
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: Questionable Culling in Kruger

Post by Richprins »

Yes, that is why they are endemic to Kruger!

nana, there is a long document here just to do with foot and mouth. It is incredibly strict!

https://www.google.co.za/url?sa=t&rct=j ... 8914,d.bGs



From infected zone:
 Break-dry buffalo biltong, free of glands and large blood
vessels and prepared with vinegar, and well-cooked buffalo
meat, may be moved from the infected zone to any destination
for own consumption (ordinary permit).
“Break-dry biltong”: when rigor mortis is complete, the meat
must be deboned, salted with cooking salt (NaCl) and
completely dried, i.e., having a ratio between water and
protein not greater than 2.25:1. It must not deteriorate at
ambient temperature.
“Well-cooked meat”: meat must be deboned and defatted,
and then subjected to heating so that an internal temperature
of 70°C or greater is maintained for a minimum of 30 minutes.
After cooking, it shall be packed and handled in such a way
that it cannot be exposed to a source of virus.


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
User avatar
nan
Posts: 26480
Joined: Thu May 31, 2012 9:41 pm
Country: Switzerland
Location: Central Europe
Contact:

Re: Questionable Culling in Kruger

Post by nan »

indeed, very strict
:ty:


Kgalagadi lover… for ever
https://safrounet.piwigo.com/
User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 75371
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: Questionable Culling in Kruger

Post by Richprins »

The thing is, as Robert pointed out, SP have been quite firm about drought being a necessary part of nature, taking out the weak animals, giving a break to predators, and not needing human intervention etc. for about a year. Which may be construed as fair enough?

But now culling has been approved, and artificial waterholes opened up again. And suddenly the needs of communities have entered the mix.

So one may be forgiven for being skeptical about the "leave it to the professionals" approach? -O-

This is very serious, and not to be compared to mopane worm harvesting, for example.

Also little mention is made of the elephant in the room by the pros? :-?


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
RobertT
Posts: 1986
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 5:58 am
Location: Fourways
Contact:

Re: Questionable Culling in Kruger

Post by RobertT »

Saw a post from Lorinda (Jumbo) asking why 3 weeks after Zuma visited with the land claims event the abattoir was refurbished. Apparently financial compensation was mentioned as well as other contributions to come were mentioned in speech.


User avatar
Richprins
Committee Member
Posts: 75371
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:52 pm
Location: NELSPRUIT
Contact:

Re: Questionable Culling in Kruger

Post by Richprins »

Ja, Rob...the visit and "handover" was before elections, and the abattoir has been under refurbishment for a while now, I think?

The point is, media are watching here too, and I get the impression SP are stalling regarding nitty-gritty replies about the exact process being followed. I also think meat has been "taken" for years now and deposited over the fence, literally.


Please check Needs Attention pre-booking: https://africawild-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=322&t=596
User avatar
Bushcraft
Posts: 13684
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 2:59 pm
Location: KZN, South Africa
Contact:

Re: Questionable Culling in Kruger

Post by Bushcraft »

Richprins wrote:The thing is, as Robert pointed out, SP have been quite firm about drought being a necessary part of nature, taking out the weak animals, giving a break to predators, and not needing human intervention etc. for about a year. Which may be construed as fair enough?

But now culling has been approved, and artificial waterholes opened up again. And suddenly the needs of communities have entered the mix.

So one may be forgiven for being skeptical about the "leave it to the professionals" approach? -O-

This is very serious, and not to be compared to mopane worm harvesting, for example.

Also little mention is made of the elephant in the room by the pros? :-?
^Q^ ^Q^ ^Q^ Correct \O

Experts don’t contradict themselves as that causes skepticism about whether experts are making the decision in the first place.

Also the amount of snared animals in the south is alarming, the continued link between rhino poaching and Kruger officials is frightening, the fact that simple polygraphing of staff is being avoided, commercialization, etc, all creates grounds for doubt about whether many have conservation at heart.


Post Reply

Return to “General Management Issues - Kruger”